Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function

"Chao Zhou (czhou)" <> Mon, 27 June 2016 00:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C7A12D0D1 for <>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cc7ejASiMSiN for <>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36A1212B031 for <>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=1842; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1466986077; x=1468195677; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=2jIurwacwOYn4afy85xwWWt/gBvwW/PCMV0Uhq83npw=; b=Q7Cu7BsKRzoq2aHm/A/izMm29DgqeBnTQKo2K8BTFchillO/HG9bKCZ/ 8kZw4IITa69VtBlWCn3NQtX7v8dggZKk/a5lHve23xeL0LGJZ2euyGbE6 An9QqOqnSMwFTSj33A0BXEokHCbQyDEwKLqGHt8AG67LwaGchbUWob2XO 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,534,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="290180192"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jun 2016 00:07:56 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5R07tW3000608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:07:56 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:07:55 -0400
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 20:07:54 -0400
From: "Chao Zhou (czhou)" <>
To: Lou Berger <>, Adrian Farrel <>, Quintin zhao <>, Lizhenbin <>, "" <>, Cyril Margaria <>, "" <>, "" <>, "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:07:54 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: TEAS WG <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:07:59 -0000

Hi Lou,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.


On 6/24/16, 8:42 PM, "Lou Berger" <> wrote:

>Authors, Contributors, WG,
>As part of the preparation for WG Adoption
>Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>Please state either:
>"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>If yes to the above, please state either:
>"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>Thank you,
>TEAS WG Chairs
>PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your