Re: [Teas] Preemption priority in GMPLS signaling for SMP

Dear Adiran,

Thank you for your email.

When a working LSP or a protecting LSP is configured, SMP can also utilize the Setup and Holding priorities in the SESSION_ATTRIBUTE object. Once the working and protecting LSPs are all configured, SMP will use the preemption priority to resolve the competition for shared resources among multiple protecting LSPs. In SMP, the LSP that is preempted by a higher priority should not be torn down.&nbsp;

Yes, 0 is the highest priority value.

Thank you again for your interest.

Best regards,

Jeong-dong

-----Original Message-----
From: "Adrian Farrel" &lt;adrian@olddog.co.uk&gt;
To: "'Jeong-dong Ryoo'" &lt;ryoo@etri.re.kr&gt;; &lt;teas@ietf.org&gt;; &lt;teas-chairs@ietf.org&gt;;
Cc: "'Bin Yeong Yoon'" &lt;byyun@etri.re.kr&gt;; "'Hejia (Jia)'" &lt;hejia@huawei.com&gt;; "'Peter Park'" &lt;peter.park@kt.com&gt;; "'Italo Busi'" &lt;italo.busi@huawei.com&gt;;
Sent: 2020-10-29 (목) 06:00:06 (UTC+09:00)
Subject: Re: [Teas] Preemption priority in GMPLS signaling for SMP

Hey Jeong-dong,
&nbsp;
Can you clarify (for those who have not been following SMP closely) why existing GMPLS signaling pre-emption priorities (session attribute set-up and hold priorities) don’t provide you with what you need?
&nbsp;
In any case, I would recommend that you use the same order of ranking used for the set-up and hold priorities. That is, 0 is the highest priority. This seems to be what you are suggesting.
&nbsp;
Best,
Adrian
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
&nbsp;
From:&nbsp;Teas &lt;teas-bounces@ietf.org&gt; On Behalf Of&nbsp;Jeong-dong RyooSent: 28 October 2020 14:38To: teas@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.orgCc: Bin Yeong Yoon &lt;byyun@etri.re.kr&gt;; Hejia (Jia) &lt;hejia@huawei.com&gt;; Peter Park &lt;peter.park@kt.com&gt;; Italo Busi &lt;italo.busi@huawei.com&gt;Subject: [Teas] Preemption priority in GMPLS signaling for SMP

&nbsp;
Dear TEAS WG,&nbsp;&nbsp;This email is to solicit your opinion on how to implement the preemption priority for GMPLS signaling extentions for Shared Mesh Protection, draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-04.&nbsp;&nbsp;As described in draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-04, the preemption priority is to resolve the competition for shared resources among multiple protecting LSPs, when controlled by the Automatic Protection Switching (APS). &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The authors of this draft would like to define one octet for the preemption priority values and state that a lower value has a higher priority. And the number of priority levels is up to the network operator. We also want to indicate the preemption priority of a protecting LSP in a new field, by shrinking the size of Reserved field, within the PROTECTION object.&nbsp;&nbsp;We would appreciate if you can provide your feedbacks on our proposal above.&nbsp;&nbsp;Best regards,&nbsp;&nbsp;Jeong-dong (on behalf of co-authors)&nbsp;

&nbsp;

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

Re: [Teas] Preemption priority in GMPLS signaling for SMP

Attachment: ~WRD0000.jpg