[Teas] Augmenting te-topo wasRe: rough notes from meeting

tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> Tue, 22 September 2020 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfa@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8E73A0C1F; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FCwxAyW8tpEl; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr150114.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.15.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E323A0C1D; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 04:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=DQilanEvZBtlAvSki7isExmnks9r2AAe5wvBlmH0D9dQ/o+WRNUb7LfcrRC8gPu0K1W7npJIDmuc7h54EW5/dUsXMnv8b/r5VD3S4b2EVtgQxQJj/MWxXYGPbf+hfGPvG1GguzgJO1NE9jBgtzj+qkpLf1h8HsgdQ1blLy11BUAG6ci5w6dcV6W57hGm2z84SFYpnO7CInfqSTUkBcE9Adi141k2StT8ze4U2O+nmwMYtrqVi6rmhLnAbB/7ACMsth8vMHWn3nDQ7dIU1AxN9QBYpAqf/ZadZyQLMlDMz7OWKmqWbvVeOBOcy1Z87FgpBbo0HlOJusREhKFzc7OXoA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qMrGgQ3v+1B6lSR+oNlpnOk1/8te67tWcYkAIMiXYmM=; b=m9YOhe1EUQYXMocQ8bF2tZaTnSVj2M33S+XhdAIX/SFFuJN9l5RahEW8AuzR+XQeOx3UibVInY+33Ywul1PbwOgeh70ZVIG/JNQDBDxx+UBpU5TKH4705YNT383FUHwYNhbzIFuZ90t6vDeZLyIV70TMCHMtzuiYWwxuFYnMqKXRBLyRJ6iEm5CEFVJ9h8i06LOAPBjV4MJhglvQpfTjkqjif3aOXTFo76MpOh0CtqsYlf1dTPaVXenVwOcpUlVPxwvDZylak/Gkus5u8rXOZAjsW5hIPLkvFh80JbLyaZH8wbSEk9R8yMOObX5HHl9wz8h6RmWTVKPCeWs76HGekg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qMrGgQ3v+1B6lSR+oNlpnOk1/8te67tWcYkAIMiXYmM=; b=VflCwKwEw23ZOnmkmyyIf3/t88GuK+7Y4wmu5Xx2igpqD9eCpu8/I8dali58V2Jg9ODX4u8nNqDfzNN/0hAhGztWS1ceD1Qfmfht7tXdjC8NtFg6MOj6DTmyp92Ht5ASWZDtS/1PyN5AYwFkOCANOS/yLy1q+yasjuqMGEJILQo=
Received: from DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:69::25) by DB7PR07MB4988.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:6b::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3412.10; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:17:42 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e863:f3ba:5345:2c00]) by DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e863:f3ba:5345:2c00%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3412.020; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:17:42 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <CCAMP@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Augmenting te-topo wasRe: [Teas] rough notes from meeting
Thread-Index: AQHWZzs7nTiE0cSKR0qBTsbHz/UQfql00TKl
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:17:42 +0000
Message-ID: <DB7PR07MB5340342789AE575F32826BD0A23B0@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <881740c6-5e91-047b-c084-ba5f004e6f09@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <881740c6-5e91-047b-c084-ba5f004e6f09@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: labn.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;labn.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [86.153.136.175]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c0fa10d6-9c0b-4327-ca3a-08d85ee91fba
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB4988:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB4988C749EE77B2FBE836DFDEA23B0@DB7PR07MB4988.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(2906002)(54906003)(316002)(6506007)(53546011)(966005)(55016002)(9686003)(33656002)(478600001)(19273905006)(86362001)(5660300002)(8936002)(83380400001)(91956017)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(110136005)(8676002)(7696005)(66476007)(186003)(4326008)(66946007)(71200400001)(76116006)(52536014)(26005)(563064011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c0fa10d6-9c0b-4327-ca3a-08d85ee91fba
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Sep 2020 11:17:42.4012 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: fmhJBUeH5yTtDoqdO9I9GI/RTZU957eTYmifCHwpELaZzFC22/r+L/Ig7quISDouo7z+uc0ZL1Idlzdz7RCF3A==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB4988
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/cEJ0jxAiSXVzN7m5eoG5drsYoWI>
Subject: [Teas] Augmenting te-topo wasRe: rough notes from meeting
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 11:17:48 -0000

Lou
(borrowing a useful email to raise a fresh topic)

When te-topo is augmented with a new technology, there is a need to specify the new type.  Should this be an augment to 
networks/network/network-types/te-topology
or an augment to 
networks/network/network-types
ie do you see the new technology sitting alongside te-topology or subordinate to it?
wson-yang is in IETF last call and has just been revised and the presence container wson-topology is subordinate to te-topology while the description says augment network types.  What matters I think is that the approach is consistent.  I looked at RFC8795 but could not see any guidance there.

Tom Petch

From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Sent: 31 July 2020 14:04
To: TEAS WG
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs
Subject: [Teas] rough notes from meeting

All,

Thank you all for participating today! Please visit
https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-108-teas?both and verify that your
comments/discussions were appropriately captured.

Thank you!

Lou (and Pavan and Matt)

## TEAS Notes For IETF 108


## Session Information


                 TEAS Agenda For IETF 108
                 Version: Jul 26, 2020

                 Session 1: Friday, July 31, 2020 (UTC)
                 11:00-12:40 Friday Session I (UTC)


| |  |
| -------- | -------- |
|  Location:    |
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/floor-plan?room=room-6 |
| Materials:    | https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/session/teas |
| Meetecho:    | http://www.meetecho.com/ietf108/teas |
| Audio stream:    | http://mp3.conf.meetecho.com/ietf/ietf1086.m3u |
| Jabber:    | http://jabber.ietf.org/logs/teas |
| WG  ICS:    |
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.ics?filters=teas |
| Session ICS:     |
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/session/28181.ics|


## Presentation       Start Time     Duration     Information

## 1    11:00    5    Title:    Administrivia & WG Status
 > Draft:
 > Presenter:    Chairs

## 2    11:05    5    Title:    WG Draft updates
 > Draft:    Many
 > Presenter:    Chairs

Adrian Farrel: draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing has been respoon
Jie Dong: The plan is to move it to other documents (currently individual)
Eric Gray: The scope of the new documents are more narrow than the
original so removal is problematic
Vishnu Beeram: Please discuss the change on the list
Lou Berger: Please discuss with WG before (re)moving text from a WG
document

## 3    11:10    10    Title:    Yang model for requesting Path Computation
 > Draft:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-10
 > Presenter:    Sergio Belotti

Lou Berger: Suggest discussing/reporting any tool issues with the tool
author -- (from jabber: report issue via https://github.com/mbj4668/pyang)
Rob Wilton (from Jabber):
   On the path computation presentation, and having looked at RFC 7950,
for issue #76 (1) and (2) I think that the pyang 2.1 behaviour is
correct.  I.e. don't include "input" and for (2), I think that this
isn't allowed. The key text being section 6.4.1 or RFC 7950



## 4    11:20    10    Title:    Yang model update
 > Draft:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-04
 >
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-03
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-09
 > Presenter:    Dhruv Dhody

Tarek Saad: Is the path computed by "template" in TE-Service mapping,
stateful in nature?
Dhruv Dhody: This is just the constraints and optimization criteria and
nothing to do with the statefulness of path.
Daniele Ceccarelli: This comes from the OSS layer, which doesn't care
about how it is provided via te tunnels, just that the service
characteristics are met

## 5    11:30    10    Title:    DT Intro, IETF Definition of Transport
Slice
 > Draft:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition-03
 > Presenter:    Jari Arkko + Reza Rokui
Actual Start Time: 11:42


## 6    11:40    10    Title:    Framework for Transport Network Slices
 > Draft:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04
     > Presenter:Eric Gray
 >
Actual Start Time: 11:53

Daniele Ceccarelli: in ACTN we have defined the interface between MDSC
and CNC as a boundary between a customer and the operator. We are now
lacking of a reference point between the MDSC and another entity within
the operator. We have identified a similar issue in the context of POI.
On the MDSC role, I agree with the interpretation.

Lou Berger: Any objections to adoption?
     <none></none>
     Please expect an adoption call on list.


## 7    11:50    10    Title:    Transport Network Slice YANG Data Model
 > Draft:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-teas-transport-network-slice-yang-01
 > Presenter:    Xufeng Liu
Actual Start time: 12:10


## 8    12:00    10    Title:     A Yang Data Model for Transport Slice NBI
 > Draft:
 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wd-teas-transport-slice-yang-02
 > Presenter:    Bo Wu
Actual Start Time: 12:18

(From Jabber) Vishnu Beeram: Note that the previous presentation ties
the modeling of a transport network slice to existing network topology
models while the current presentation focuses on the service view of a
slice. Please chime in with your views on these 2 approaches (either
here or on the list).. There seems to be a case being made (by both sets
of authors) to make room for both -- please discuss if you have any
objections...
Lou Berger: Please take comments/discussion to list

## 9    12:10    10    Title:    Network Slicing with Flexible Traffic
Engineering
 > Draft:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzhang-teas-network-slicing-with-flex-te-00
 > Presenter:    Jeffrey Zhang
Actual Start Time: 12:26

Please take comments/discussion to list

## 10    12:20    10    Title:    Packet Network Slicing using Segment
Routing
 > Draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-peng-teas-network-slicing-03
 > Presenter:    Ran Chen
Actual Start Time: 12:31

Please take comments/discussion to list

## 11    12:30    10    Title:    A YANG Data Model for MPLS-TE Topology
 > Draft:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busizheng-teas-yang-te-mpls-topology-00
 > Presenter:    Italo Busi
 > Actual Start Time: 12:36

Please take comments/discussion to list

## Adjourn    12:40
 >




_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas