Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-central-control

Anurag Sharma <ansha@google.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ansha@google.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F3612EB2F for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PAdMc864Vj30 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2B312944F for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t26so161415321qtg.0 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=oEsFo3MIDOzBuhMcg0eNjpRJy94Vu3iX5Xz0xcuPNXw=; b=PPB1xCMF69YcJHB02oQn0n2iNVH+YNu1kjYCr1Gr5uglP8beE3ekqopwfTJScBmSl0 C0XnMm/tm0Hhx/rpkG0g6yX0lmOZO2fS8wZr8QNWAK5IZTdEQtDT6TctcFEDv5PKg8Bn imDQZaL2DilT0blKJh+9U4GoSQ1Za2Mp/DYi4xKLMw3CYhVeuJHT1MqoOOBX7L1d7hDn ylht5mDwBQdDB2mGSD6moYPgIasVJPBveV8Yswmpp3e2sl5fqJosNSJIIWJXi8pMiktk vBdBKjA9cS3DfbcnE5gq8LqXnhmaouTt1TXNaTRnULRnXfd2qiRPB7IonzE3aMl53zaC 2asg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=oEsFo3MIDOzBuhMcg0eNjpRJy94Vu3iX5Xz0xcuPNXw=; b=e9daEIiW4RWgrlrkF8K5vAbnpkXBiu+ZpAurt7QauNzpUbkZqX9mO3b0ALFHZw4SuB 5b3DqBQKcYjLxiBUqBRuUZQHu0N6L4w1x/JNsi4GyewRvizd8BeWe4nziM3ed9PdrMgJ nKWcMzDHIkU+u+pgFC/Ei93H3DQqv1bt+Y+zrIolkUqSBfMfIALPr9xTvDBNrJf+/iIl J3LOY9XIfr5KN9K4rKF8YtVHgn30OAjXEcrYRQLwkPmbky/r8xR8gAeyBu0QMo7u4JLp pWuKuifOxxVHFeTtURQPo3lpisD1s/Tp1+OYW3RlUAUEbHP1bMLam2ezfT1gSD++Vaoc T5NA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCLVQ1tqE2NOSpHslNqxxzNL3Qe8dME+RqHpaXACN5xyyqjs3+Z J1eGkM5BT9qLPyp+hCAVE7K48Sq0jNO5
X-Received: by 10.237.63.39 with SMTP id p36mr34780082qtf.81.1495647073483; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.20.235 with HTTP; Wed, 24 May 2017 10:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b4f834e44ebd42b898575faff2e6e141@sv-ex13-prd1.infinera.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvckqLVww7wQTVu6a==B_iG6=Fs5EX=3NbVNJyQOQp6Aw@mail.gmail.com> <8629a9ffff2c486aaaa4a7d413917b28@sv-ex13-prd1.infinera.com> <008801d2d4af$837a2070$8a6e6150$@olddog.co.uk> <b4f834e44ebd42b898575faff2e6e141@sv-ex13-prd1.infinera.com>
From: Anurag Sharma <ansha@google.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:31:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJFj48LpJO50ZYGvLGF1anJ4igrfoqqUOOHb1kpag_qywR=5sA@mail.gmail.com>
To: teas@ietf.org, Iftekhar Hussain <IHussain@infinera.com>, vishnupavan@gmail.com, afarrel@juniper.net, quintin.zhao@huawei.com, lizhenbin@huawei.com, chao.zhou@cisco.com, cmargaria@juniper.net, scheruathur@juniper.net, eric.wu@huawei.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140961286b7eb055048782a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/JOeXR0dEYHLY7h1hrH5dS6fb1Rg>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-central-control
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:31:17 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft



Thanks,

Anurag


>
>
> *From:* Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, May 22, 2017 1:56 PM
> *To:* afarrel@juniper.net; quintin.zhao@huawei.com; lizhenbin@huawei.com;
> chao.zhou@cisco.com; cmargaria@juniper.net; scheruathur@juniper.net;
> Dhruv Dhody; Daniel King; Iftekhar Hussain; Anu Sharma; eric.wu@huawei.com
> *Cc:* teas@ietf.org; TEAS WG Chairs
> *Subject:* Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-central-control
>
>
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> TEAS WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>