Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection

LEI LIU <liulei.kddi@gmail.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 01:31 UTC

Return-Path: <liulei.kddi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46CB12944D; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:31:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3O4B2ntrYXdR; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:31:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E728F128B37; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:30:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id y76so53739382qkb.0; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:30:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8yJdkfgvLuKTwjIXMl4LDE9QkrXN34WZeRWUc9aNJOg=; b=PVMYTcLKrGX/TzW/NwujgZmAwHEdR40cZsCT43t9E5sXnEa6bM49BXSymP0B2+L3wF 6yM5lH30MWAJN5ySXxUt05YMcNetwL8HYeXtIxeziwk7+vnNvJpntyBv1JSzRqbZY1tM LKUfTzEv5H9RnBct08wPotnkklZkDrEO3j2dAfPgyXxng1+iHHfs4+e/kY/HMddros7c 59iZHxHgWQk06w95vE00xKoCLH1FJ/dJuIwevAvM9WT/W2WVFs4lAWN/kWsmZr9vtwCA WJQ/t/vpnPkT+nF67J+vxTgw0ELGTuoNv1ol80m7OFJ4nCs7YSjoVWKCtxEozVrIq2V1 qm+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8yJdkfgvLuKTwjIXMl4LDE9QkrXN34WZeRWUc9aNJOg=; b=qd0jTb5id2LtFXg2k+jNr4/kM68ErSQHIb7yUz1sAM0l9s4eR3rJNxNhXTEWUB7RVc 2uv6zV+b0kjP69DLCSiHvFsSXJhtlH35iCiRK3MU4f9LhbQmJYXjVtg2CFkEvUdDBfNw annvbM2nQI0vyO//zEbivS20ITZX7LO+haxyjOWiOVitQ2fXjvckDpHHws3aJlPUTgHx +ZUl/AJDJb5BXpYOfyPwKjTid6OS/AQKbpvTUdHudTiIydoaBtw1JxcsegGQcHaFSGhK bLAneggWhwMEVfEaXbCw0JpeCSVO5/I6nIa4bGRr56EhVYbDX6JYdHkM5IRTeFHt7QEB i4xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mROt/j73qqsa3//K3MO/J6O3GSpk7qwlNEbI1I+xpQ+iw0pHeKCach8oymAuznJXQQm2XLzUp8Uw+pjw==
X-Received: by 10.237.59.91 with SMTP id q27mr19938802qte.193.1488850259042; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:30:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.35.211 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:30:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTthjgtzu3WKc7=2jeVYg=4bXTuctoS6jpLY6PYUqGV-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+YzgTthjgtzu3WKc7=2jeVYg=4bXTuctoS6jpLY6PYUqGV-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: LEI LIU <liulei.kddi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:30:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEy9f1mfy_3kVuU12gojz7Ss0Zs8-mfd9yc0fQwqGbYeyAEW6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0e773ed06b48054a19f64e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/JZQLLZHZCu3SIiXjWeiX1eDwejY>
Cc: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>, Markus Jork <mjork@juniper.net>, Boris.Zhang@telus.com, Richard Li <renwei.li@huawei.com>, Ning So <ningso01@gmail.com>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, zhenbin.li@huawei.com, hliu@ciena.com, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, mehmet.toy@verizon.com, Yimin Shen <yshen@juniper.net>, "Xu, Fengman" <fengman.xu@verizon.com>, Quintin zhao <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:31:02 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Best regards,
Lei

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> Pavan and Lou
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>