Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-11.txt

[Leeyoung <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lou,

Yes, you are correct, the first option is what we have taken. I agree with you that the second option does not make much sense. 

Thanks.
Young

-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 1:08 PM
To: Leeyoung <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-11.txt

Hi Young,


On 10/4/2018 10:29 AM, Leeyoung wrote:
>
> Hi Lou,
>
> I think we can do the augmentation approach.
>
> If we were to augment LxSM models, we have two choices:
>
> ·First choice: To have three separate augmented LxSM models so that 
> each LxSM would augment independently from one another.
>
> ·Second choice: To have one YANG model where three augmentations take 
> place there, which means all three LxSM models are augmented at the 
> same time.
>
> I would think the first choice is what you meant.
>

There's certainly room for identifying what is the best approach . This said, I actually don't understand the second choice and unsure if it can be legally supported (what does it mean for an implementation to support of module that includes an augmentation to a non-supported module? maybe it works with deviations?) While not sure about this, it sounds / looks like you took the first choice.

Lou

> Thanks.
>
> Young
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]]
>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 6:05 PM
>
> To: Leeyoung <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>
> Subject: Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for 
> draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-11.txt
>
> Young,
>
>     There was one comment on the list other than my question, right? 
> Giuseppe's comment basically says it is provider information, right? 
> So isn't this what NACM is all about, i.e., limiting information based 
> on who is asking for it. So I still am unconvinced that the complexity 
> of a new module yields any benefit.
>
> Just think of it from a transaction processing perspective.  With the 
> proposed approach, a client that wants to understand the mapping has 
> to
>
> (1) read the service module), (2) search the service module for a 
> mapping, and then (3) read the related TE information.  With the 
> augmentation approach (2) is eliminated and during processing (1) it's 
> possible to see if the TE information even exists.  This reduces 
> processing on both clients and servers.
>
> While not a major point, I do think the added complexity should be 
> more strongly justified.
>
> Lou
>
> On 9/25/2018 5:57 PM, Leeyoung wrote:
>
> > Hi Lou,
>
> >
>
> > I think this has been discussed in the mailing list when you asked
> the opinion on this issue. Please see the attachment.
>
> >
>
> > Please also refer to the IETF 102 slides (in particular page 3) for
> further information on this model and why the co-authors think it is 
> beneficial to have a separate model than augmenting three separate 
> service models.
>
> >
>
> > Thanks.
>
> > Young
>
> >
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: Teas [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 3:32 PM
>
> > To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>
> > Subject: Re: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for
>
> > draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-11.txt
>
> >
>
> > Hi Young/authors,
>
> >
>
> >       Thanks for the update.  I remain a bit confused/concerned that
>
> > this document adds a new standalone model rather than taking the
>
> > simpler approach of just augmenting the existing 
> > service/connectivity
>
> > modules with the pointers to the TE/VN/tunnel information (perhaps
>
> > using
>
> > groupings?)
>
> >
>
> > Can you elaborate on your thinking here?
>
> >
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Lou
>
> >
>
> > On 9/18/2018 2:55 PM, Leeyoung wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
>
> >>
>
> >> The revision is to fix YANG errors caused by the L1CSM YANG update. 
> No content changes.
>
> >>
>
> >> Thanks.
>
> >> Young
>
> >>
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
>
> >> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 1:54 PM
>
> >> To: Daniele Ceccarelli <[e-mail]>; Giuseppe
>
> >> Fioccola <[e-mail]>; Dhruv Dhody
>
> >> <[e-mail]>; Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]>; 
> >> Leeyoung
>
> >> <[e-mail]>; Qin Wu <[e-mail]>
>
> >> Subject: New Version Notification for
>
> >> draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-11.txt
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> A new version of I-D, draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-11.txt
>
> >> has been successfully submitted by Young Lee and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
> >>
>
> >> Name: draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang
>
> >> Revision:       11
>
> >> Title:                             Traffic Engineering and Service
> Mapping Yang Model
>
> >> Document date: 2018-09-18
>
> >> Group: Individual Submission
>
> >> Pages: 22
>
> >> URL: 
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping
> -yang-11.txt
>
> >> Status: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yan
> g/
>
> >> Htmlized: 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-11
>
> >> Htmlized: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lee-teas-te-service-mappin
> g-yang
>
> >> Diff: 
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lee-teas-te-service-mapping-ya
> ng-11
>
> >>
>
> >> Abstract:
>
> >>      This document provides a YANG data model to map customer 
> >>service
>
> >>      models (e.g., the L3VPM Service Model) to Traffic Engineering 
> >>(TE)
>
> >>      models (e.g., the TE Tunnel or the Abstraction and Control of
>
> >>      Traffic Engineered Networks Virtual Network model). This model 
> >>is
>
> >>      referred to as TE Service Mapping Model and is applicable to 
> >>the
>
> >>      operator's need for seamless control and management of their 
> >>VPN
>
> >>      services with TE tunnel support.
>
> >>
>
> >>      The model is principally used to allow monitoring and
> diagnostics of
>
> >>      the management systems to show how the service requests are 
> >>mapped
>
> >>      onto underlying network resource and TE models.
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
> tools.ietf.org.
>
> >>
>
> >> The IETF Secretariat
>
> >>
>
> >> _______________________________________________
>
> >> Teas mailing list
>
> >> [e-mail]
>
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>
> >>
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > Teas mailing list
>
> > [e-mail]
>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > Teas mailing list
>
> > [e-mail]
>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas