Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-10

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 11 August 2021 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4023A12FE; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 04:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PmYGf7majut9; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 04:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4AA93A12FC; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 04:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 17BBxOsI024639; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:59:24 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424B34604E; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:59:24 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1264604B; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:59:24 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:59:24 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([195.166.134.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 17BBxMEW005389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:59:23 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Vishnu Pavan Beeram'" <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "'Daniel King'" <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, "'John E Drake'" <jdrake@juniper.net>, "'Zhenghaomian \(Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept\)'" <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>, <younglee.tx@gmail.com>, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "'Belotti, Sergio \(Nokia - IT\)'" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>, "'Daniele Ceccarelli'" <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
Cc: "'TEAS WG Chairs'" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "'TEAS WG'" <teas@ietf.org>
References: <CA+YzgTuQLb6HjAH2i0mQEhqJcbhm0VL6aJqXjbcK=F+4-3ZsSQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTuQLb6HjAH2i0mQEhqJcbhm0VL6aJqXjbcK=F+4-3ZsSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:59:22 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <006201d78ea8$53bb4230$fb31c690$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0063_01D78EB0.B5804670"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIvzBFZTg2qc5O/1wPGb0GpYWN5Yaq9ttoA
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 195.166.134.82
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2034-8.6.0.1018-26338.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--19.670-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--19.670-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2034-8.6.1018-26338.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--19.670100-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: /77LoUQXvQ/xIbpQ8BhdbKJVTu7sjgg1pQH4ogtVQP0tferJ/d7Ab8OL WoD10UccnkdZZMkzym3JvYCIm0Kk+m/KfbMDywuB/Ca4Pt73t1tlRzZAkKRGDYEBeX0uQ+npvIM Y50t8raoPwfxCd+gamI09Tff/aCQZtrZWHaNDZ4RO8qlnOXFSz+DTYjejIZTwuIFMsySA2xbE8a AlfqGmju4ntHg8jXuSOZpzYUNyqV3hCyMvOzC6/vRR4zaLaXcQKVrLOZD1BXQZSz1vvG+0moR9z rjZqqsWR8EC1tit1BsGi/o41FQQ44tZ4DlHrpADfY+iJfFQBxe061diBteN10M3aOSc6u2sbzfE h6zaV24Lg54fWmT6Srmn1yJ14rlbtZo26JRp8wQM6z3iDvziBxoMTb73iC7BdDwP5ItpCOzesTw 6jtmPrkkk6yagWKEsr/EwLya77le0CeKFBeer6FICmG2RRehovO61PPXizylFdhD9u4+PBMTr/G 24o7RrhWQmZZ+uR46qKXbpBKHp1aXfXkUfELSVRR+qE4iJsIddxx6WRf+5sJaaJ+6lPmLV9+doe RMj31Bw6IvlmsNskiqFmu/h/tw7u4AM1i3aFvYvj6wHfIGxyS2VljVYB9GNsstO9qYbwEkWPO8/ JEnOWc+9+OQ9U/5f33fj+sMArfMaMUyeC0staJwDp1OIv3zj91n8I31c7G7egJibbN6PqDG6m9e J0CqhXJwpxyW+M5UH0rIprTfFJg==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Jz8sEx3bQsoozDbLNrOz2SmVZ08>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-10
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:59:50 -0000

Hi Pavan,

 

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

 

I also note that there is no IPR disclosed against RFC 8453 or draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices which may be regarded as the foundational documents for this work.

 

Best,

Adrian

 

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> 
Sent: 11 August 2021 09:58
To: Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>uk>; John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>et>; Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept) <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>om>; Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>uk>; younglee.tx@gmail.com; mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT) <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>om>; Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>rg>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-10

 

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  or
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  or
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
  appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS 

MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,

Pavan and Lou