IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt

"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com> Mon, 03 October 2016 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8E712B244; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 05:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ecUmxSu2-338; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 05:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA72912B220; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 05:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11744; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1475498054; x=1476707654; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=/6N8BVA/HQq9fhhlUpWT2oPg5gaBZr11pJ5RWG79Y/w=; b=kDUCiqoQauiTSM9zDMqi0wBUgVPoEmQd5Prhok/ZY06qRlvcXASsPSKy iF9VyCGFCuBUV197BZ2nGVI3RMogufMddiwJP/kghkJ3aK6nDcrdSqScc lr7txAkJiJCPNgm3JXP/On0lwgxCD5kFWufaBODW5Ie1B/LCkZD2w/70y Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AhAgDRT/JX/40NJK1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgwc2AQEBAQEeV3wHhCSJB5Z/h1iHOYUSggYkhXoCHIFKOBQBAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RhAQEBBCNRBRACAQgRAwECKAMCAgIfERQJCAIEAQ0FiDMDFw6vEoh1DYNOAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHIY4gX0IglCCR4FPEAIBMgmCZCuCLwWZQzUBhiaGSoMAgW5OhBiJHohdhBGDfQEeNoJlgidyAQGGU4EAAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,289,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="158541170"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Oct 2016 12:34:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com (xch-rcd-016.cisco.com [173.37.102.26]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u93CYDfa014999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:34:13 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 07:34:13 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 07:34:12 -0500
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, "robert.h.venator.civ@mail.mil" <robert.h.venator.civ@mail.mil>, "y.kamite@ntt.com" <y.kamite@ntt.com>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt
Thread-Index: AQHSHKhvYvUoCkppBE6hZpAypnb5dqCWvFYA
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 12:34:12 +0000
Message-ID: <1B29BE9B-F135-4349-BA85-BF5E206722C4@cisco.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvk7n5eDjTB=cjQL+pAQajHCNcD3_G2zeBW6t1BZMCfPQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvk7n5eDjTB=cjQL+pAQajHCNcD3_G2zeBW6t1BZMCfPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.15.1.160411
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.249.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1B29BE9BF1354349BA85BF5E206722C4ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Kutv93_0CY8H9aXidNZvIoHnnSU>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 12:34:43 -0000

Hi Pavan, WG,

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.  Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2307/

Thanks,
Rakesh


From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>>
Date: Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 8:28 AM
To: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com<mailto:tsaad@cisco.com>>, RAKESH GANDHI <rgandhi@cisco.com<mailto:rgandhi@cisco.com>>, Zafar Ali <zali@cisco.com<mailto:zali@cisco.com>>, "robert.h.venator.civ@mail.mil<mailto:robert.h.venator.civ@mail.mil>" <robert.h.venator.civ@mail.mil<mailto:robert.h.venator.civ@mail.mil>>, "y.kamite@ntt.com<mailto:y.kamite@ntt.com>" <y.kamite@ntt.com<mailto:y.kamite@ntt.com>>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>" <teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email