[Teas] Design Team work on RFC3272bis

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 02 November 2019 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8EB120096 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 10:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OmcE0oCI35ja for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 10:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 660591208B0 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 10:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xA2HNWuZ015637 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 17:23:32 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D54122044 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 17:23:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2860E22042 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 17:23:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([84.93.96.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xA2HNVfj009622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 17:23:31 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: teas@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 17:23:30 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <014e01d591a2$3fdaefe0$bf90cfa0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdWRoj2PvkzIo7L7RxyqREy3HmzBCg==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 84.93.96.25
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25018.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.867-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--15.867-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25018.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--15.866500-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: i20fXLuMR8CAoug8VYRQh7nFs9cSXx1mDvc/j9oMIgWoevtizL2shyzr MMF3CEtHhKNH1ahKTSYf7zSMOv96WwvpfXyH90tsw+OcqR96DFelAfiiC1VA/RLf1vz7ecPHy7G fJgQPXP68lVUVe6zc+1zj7quCD6AkT5Q2XJoRBqpcrmR4Jr5uaJ4oEP/S42Q27K1LubUeVGieSo gd/P0njxNvnR3dZuEWzzU2+MLrDVSDX2CAyOsKNr9A3Bl1/DcVZZ5HkRNGNgOxHvem8y6Tr/mKH e8cWDGDLelrxz3b35K6QumZsbIA/lBvXX9lKCfP/Tc2iq45CnsgKgv9Gnh9Bx0scA07hungKTHk hVNiLxXDA4e7Bp+WKhJ3a79toPzuqFZwILJBsHe8coKUcaOOvcaQpGBbw4u3feWP3eOgGK6jxYy RBa/qJQOkBnb8H8GW0KkIUsNMdlTdB/CxWTRRu/558CedkGIvIXptJJqT2TE=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/M6Ec4v-oKOm4-njreKK6VrLoTSI>
Subject: [Teas] Design Team work on RFC3272bis
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 17:23:46 -0000

Hi,

The Design Team has some output. It is still very much work in progress, but we have something to work with.

Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> 
Sent: 02 November 2019 17:22
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-01.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis
Revision:	01
Title:		Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic Engineering
Document date:	2019-11-02
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		73
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-01
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-01

Abstract:
   This memo describes the principles of Traffic Engineering (TE) in the
   Internet.  The document is intended to promote better understanding
   of the issues surrounding traffic engineering in IP networks, and to
   provide a common basis for the development of traffic engineering
   capabilities for the Internet.  The principles, architectures, and
   methodologies for performance evaluation and performance optimization
   of operational IP networks are discussed throughout this document.

   This work was first published as RFC 3272 in May 2002.  This document
   obsoletes RFC 3272 by making a complete update to bring the text in
   line with current best practices for Internet traffic engineering and
   to include references to the latest relevant work in the IETF.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat