Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-wd-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 25 August 2021 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516613A1F6B; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gw6ZVuBDdd3B; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5011B3A1F71; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id v16so22509934ilo.10; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YxwKEMxay4i9JsoY625sYchMmLg2pab88kIcCmTHeoM=; b=OcKkXLbA83omrOuuEj6UMr9ZnNrt78zztAHIZzdmiyRqngIhSsMHeOtJLQb6xhEPoC VybjbgXD8Y+wRETAs7NULlTGJeAOjABzbNFcpKMhzQ3uNG5AVCosaISe4FhvD5T2pL2Q Wjk/pPgoE0LzONA2P4tyEqhOjR+gj9J8YMpisO1vk4/C7K5QAZNmW/4rqneUlgXTaegM K2t6ZUeIyf0qhXUBtx82gYbFkSpXTx66RTa5SmDMhbu4rlscKXsDjq3pnCKJco/R4H6l 90XPB2FLTOCcpb/YaGo0tO50a3RbPwCvEW8XfTwyNRXjnyudGV+UteoWQo8T0lF+5J1/ 2w3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YxwKEMxay4i9JsoY625sYchMmLg2pab88kIcCmTHeoM=; b=Tdi8UxpCY3ExKt9Cf9WvlHq39Tr6Lv3GOjjXudJ3No8cU7uBaYp4kJR1BKhBHYuZM8 wMAJo0S13aGGOdyFPkNCs6oLi1zbOVjP1FmkD3mv0ch6GIxS4yk9JflFROwiPupNLqqk VyvRY/gyDIREs+3xUtyp0jWO6L2wRJkz3AJjG8bkss5b4I3t3sopOpHvUBUzcySa/0pr bHwD3gK9t2ueDjHDFBPY1GjxeGVltxgP6VroqPcd07/EmlJDzFlGTu3wePyhGHJIlWSN 1/e1XBXbNXXOWuXN+LuZVOahE3aVQJ407hmvb7SH+MJiFmsE+IU9+uEjFcxxbPWweB5R 6TXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338aP2keVTHAQpw4x6fJ1Qzab1llyseGfA0S2z7z6cFygQ5wFEX XR2eMKPeICdQZpZDbpTu16ZvrDQ8oXuGMny3Frk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxoNRMovZ15dQWMKEIKo/LTzf41/5oGGXUPKvNesqFFjq5Umk81rjnFjaiRgO9VBBvr5ZFo01CQV3O31SlNNic=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:c5ac:: with SMTP id r12mr9270326ilt.279.1629858437597; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTvOMZ1ZDby9oe6can4veJefZBfcNoCgzb7en0o2JBi-5Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvOMZ1ZDby9oe6can4veJefZBfcNoCgzb7en0o2JBi-5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 07:56:41 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn7DKCpe=mWPGk4iUj_1rvPnXWK+p6CSGA5C74SAu4_m5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com>, "Rokui, Reza (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <reza.rokui@nokia.com>, Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net>, hanliuyan@chinamobile.com, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003510b205ca58fd24"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/My4OpHAAaFn_bNerpTLPg4n2uR0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-wd-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 02:27:25 -0000

Hi Pavan & Lou,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:00 PM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?
>
>   Please state either:
>
>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>   or
>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>   or
>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>   appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> Pavan and Lou
>
>