Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 21 September 2022 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2911FC14F722; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0hNW-xc2Htxo; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFA25C14F747; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 28LGS4TL007941; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:28:04 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603B44604F; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:28:04 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C424604D; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:28:04 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:28:04 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (152.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.152] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 28LGS345005920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:28:03 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Vishnu Pavan Beeram' <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, 'John E Drake' <jdrake@juniper.net>, "'Rokui, Reza'" <rrokui@ciena.com>, shunsuke.homma.ietf@gmail.com, 'Kiran Makhijani' <kiranm@futurewei.com>, 'LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO' <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>, 'Jeff Tantsura' <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, ewgray@graiymage.com, 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, 'Dhruv Dhody' <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "'Dongjie (Jimmy)'" <jie.dong@huawei.com>, 'Xufeng Liu' <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>, 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <CA+YzgTu76Czai8EnE8ErQYnqugrCAcBj5E195CTazapk2kwHCA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTu76Czai8EnE8ErQYnqugrCAcBj5E195CTazapk2kwHCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:28:02 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <039801d8cdd7$1f921640$5eb642c0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0399_01D8CDDF.81571A80"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJR9CJXiHUCmfjfPpV7/2jcZCeArqz3xWEQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.152
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27156.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--26.399-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--26.399-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27156.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--26.399300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: qsaWi0FWcYvmicbHRUsaV3FPUrVDm6jtyHdfpwipSH7kMnUVL5d0E1gG seFCzh0AfZMQzrDhKxfmMy6HzT8pzAsbkbSHcUnIlVHM/F6YkvQejl8XURi8fK73LMce7RmJ4I/ r0/g0c4RKyH3RChyusCzDqAsHlaYc28TY4LGPyU2fgML7lG8+KVNkVKKJON2eShS1xYMAnypif9 fhyqj7/CB6sKA1i/K0OvJuZuh8AdUf41Ow0sRYU44V8tCoXo/S2aGwk4OLNSzk++hGM2nSe493W UsgC0XihuvkQ1oZ9eC5Vsoh0ZYTKSd5sBMtvHu7E7sLdRVaGmffVqwz+CynaZ0oD5Lw3bToEqSm Dx1CZ0qQiUqgvBUFUDwNakGbUKNlOY0uFdPXUM5SAphtkUXoaLzutTz14s8pmcHarMzdQ5TE6/x tuKO0a6o26ijO4A/5BfDtz6DKa8Kl315FHxC0lcPDPFi81d1ACCdq6k3LmHbNiXmDPBs02ffnaH kTI99QHpzILIkWa6f770KfKft/uK4QAeQvIGeqGUubsVz8TekFoTFl6ollsg6Z7keXmSiWL+n8S KWxKYvOH38lNbOoTH5a0HZNRmGzqYvx0PaiR9aeAiCmPx4NwGmRqNBHmBve1B0Hk1Q1KyKbBVa1 rlvjN1KMqIeOstifkU6UkIr/V+1nME/Jsn/m+g==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/N1aTYh4jGb3pNRDGXxrqbDhcNxg>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:28:28 -0000

Thanks for checking, Pavan.

 

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

 

Adrian

 

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> 
Sent: 21 September 2022 17:08
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>; Rokui, Reza <rrokui@ciena.com>; shunsuke.homma.ietf@gmail.com; Kiran Makhijani <kiranm@futurewei.com>; LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com>; Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>; ewgray@graiymage.com; Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>; mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>; Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14

 

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG last call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

ps: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.