[Teas] draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices ready for last call
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 30 June 2022 09:01 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3998EC14CF0E; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 02:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.926
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.926 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3pK6bA2R7rP1; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 02:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3661DC14F74A; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 02:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 25U91DsM001384; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:13 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05409460AA; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:12 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0249D4608F; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:12 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (93.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.93] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 25U91AIq006734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:11 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:01:10 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <09e801d88c5f$f1e702e0$d5b508a0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AdiMX/ALRslPlASTTnmpB9LlLL5C/g==
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.93
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-26986.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--1.060-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--1.060-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-26986.006
X-TMASE-Result: 10--1.060000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: zhUgrjUmACzZZ7BZ4UeyMHFPUrVDm6jtQR7lWMXPA1u15eNIExieaRkh ChIO6vg862DujlA1QKazWzB621SmgqGX7vR40S2IGqSG/c50XgOKuUrTR9ZhGRHSnZFtYhQi2Hu w61jLswDBkZxeRpQ+RASVB8LWXBCYAP3vIlpZplOeAiCmPx4NwLTrdaH1ZWqCdcD5PxhxmQO9nX agA01wSQ1fA1QHegDv3QfwsVk0UbtuRXh7bFKB7u0k8XE0oggQZnPEUbxzHFe0TwxSskVgZc+gT /MSRNG9XwjihSrlWBo=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/NDFB_-J6B0VzTLO74Zyxb-kCafs>
Subject: [Teas] draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices ready for last call
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:01:18 -0000
Hi chairs, My work list is now empty for this draft. (People should shout if they think I missed something they previously raised!) We have seen a lot of convergence from other documents as they move to use the latest versions of the terminology. On the whole, that has been smooth, although it did lead to some debate about the definition of an NRP and that is reflected in this latest revision. I think we are now ready to move this document forward so that the dependent solutions documents have a stable reference. Over to you for the last call? Cheers, Adrian
- [Teas] draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices ready … Adrian Farrel