Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-06

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Thu, 30 June 2022 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40301C15BE8B; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 01:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6O5KbvuGf7E; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 01:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE649C15AAC1; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 01:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LYWGt4m7cz67mCt; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:10:30 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.123) by fraeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:12:49 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.110) by kwepemi100016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:12:47 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.110]) by kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.110]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:12:47 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-06
Thread-Index: AQHYis6vM6FbNzm6ckebtj6KJsHfeq1nlWrQ
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:12:47 +0000
Message-ID: <dd20778f4a94439ab7bee08a1e84a43a@huawei.com>
References: <CA+YzgTs4Z5eEKQfWs19chLxq1bHN0oiRDPfkqWJROsUrNXFnWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTs4Z5eEKQfWs19chLxq1bHN0oiRDPfkqWJROsUrNXFnWw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.66]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_dd20778f4a94439ab7bee08a1e84a43ahuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/NGJoQxL9ExNPaDOnMU3KGOJ21EI>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-06
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 08:12:57 -0000

Hi chairs,

I support the adoption of this document. It provides useful information about the possible use cases of IETF network slice, and also tries to map the use cases to the attributes and parameters defined in the network slice service YANG model.

It seems this document could better align the terminology with draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices and draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang.

Another comment is for the 5G network slice use cases, some of the text is good background information about 5G network slicing, while may not have requirement to the IETF network slice, thus my suggestion is that part may be simplified.

Best regards,
Jie

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 5:07 PM
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-06

All,

This is start of a *two* week poll on making
draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-06 a TEAS working group document
[https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-06].

Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".
If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If
yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see
addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends July 12th.

Thank you,
Pavan and Lou