[Teas] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection-16: (with COMMENT)
Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 07 March 2018 19:36 UTC
Return-Path: <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF491200F1; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 11:36:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection@ietf.org, Vishnu Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, teas-chairs@ietf.org, vishnupavan@gmail.com, teas@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.74.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152045140086.17589.6073629540164613576.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 11:36:40 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/NLrqVhEoaWlWPTHemAr2zdUfWV8>
Subject: [Teas] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 19:36:41 -0000
Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection-16: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree with the SecDir reviewer that the referenced security considerations are adequate, but it would be helpful to restate what's available in this draft. One does not expect an RFC from 1997 to cover integrity protections (hop-by-hop) and authentication, so stating that these mechanisms are part of the protocol would be helpful. I did not dig into to see what was used for those functions or if they are adequate today (if they have not been updated, they are likely due). Additionally, 2 of the other referenced RFCs had the additional use of filters, does that apply here? Can you add a couple sentences about that as well? I assume they do apply, otherwise the references would not be included. Thank you!
- [Teas] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-… Kathleen Moriarty