Re: [Teas] Network Slicing design team definitions - isolation and resolution

[Zhenghaomian <[e-mail]>]

Not sure if I understand your question correctly. 
Well, it's reasonable for people to request hard isolation because 'I don't want my data to be transported together with other people's data'. 
For delivery this can be achieved by separating physical devices/connections, which are visible to users. For example dedicated boxes and fibers will guarantee the user's data is not mixed with others...

Best wishes,
Haomian

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[e-mail]] 
发送时间: 2020年4月26日 10:34
收件人: Zhenghaomian <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
主题: Re: [Teas] Network Slicing design team definitions - isolation and resolution

(trimmed)
What is the user perceivable effect that the user is asking for when you say "if the user requests isolation"?

Yours,
Joel

On 4/25/2020 10:31 PM, Zhenghaomian wrote:
> Hi, Kiran, Joel,
> 
...
> BTW, regarding the isolation, I don't see the necessity to argue whether it should be in SLO or not. The isolation itself, can either be requested by the user of the transport slice (then from NBI of TSC) to express the demand of reliability, or be offered by the provider of the transport slice (then from the SBI of TSC) to achieve the SLO requested from the user. In other words, if the user requests certain level of isolation in an SLO, such isolation should be provided; if the user does not request certain level of isolation (no isolation request in SLO), then there may be some isolation provided to satisfy the user's request.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Haomian