Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute

"Mike Taillon (mtaillon)" <> Mon, 19 October 2015 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCB51A1B6B; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jET_huoQIbmC; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 779C41A1B0B; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 06:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=14982; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445261447; x=1446471047; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=4GhciMx+9kSq8cBTpRFkMdmnFNNphv9tEfEuEnSmknY=; b=gGYYL0qK0wuPlKWoCDrErCrlIbRC1AwNtbzoHZd0P75qMCGpxehJntYS QaHLUlE8xrWiOe1nIrrzFCvvzB41kuyPLoN+xlWEzh0o9fIosNKfvkX7p EbuhVF/OEPIyPLFJzbXQjubYaxA+vQmEDn0TiMBe/LfVr9Raqv0jPkaKT 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.17,702,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="38889042"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2015 13:30:45 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9JDUj8r003178 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:30:45 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:30:27 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:30:27 -0500
From: "Mike Taillon (mtaillon)" <>
To: "" <>, "" <>, "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <>, "" <>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <>, "" <>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute
Thread-Index: AQHRCRMpZUMqruN3REmFajAE5hXlhp5xlE6AgAA5kICAAVjNAA==
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:30:27 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A698BE37E784FA89408DE3D7556D0FBciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:30:50 -0000

Hi WG chairs/all,

I am not aware of any IPR except what's mentioned below.


From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <<>>
Date: Sunday, October 18, 2015 at 9:31 AM
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <<>>, "Mike Taillon (mtaillon)" <<>>, Tarek Saad <<>>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <<>>, "<>" <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Cc: "<>" <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute

Hi Chairs, WG,

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.

Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules, as following:


From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <<>>
Date: Saturday, 17 October, 2015 3:36 PM
To: "=SMTP:mtaillon@cisco. com" <<>>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <<>>, Rakesh Gandhi <<>>, Zafar Ali <<>>, "<>" <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Cc: "<>" <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute

Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG),

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

   If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

  If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed

If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
information, please see the RFCs listed above and

Thank you,
- TEAS WG Chairs

PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your