[Teas] Fwd: FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-01

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Mon, 16 October 2017 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3F5133187; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r1F9M2xU9Rzl; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x233.google.com (mail-pg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60DEC134505; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id b192so7373334pga.2; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q7bOxhypfy7ZtYeGibQ+3v+cLl6BnKl4sLEbK27IWKA=; b=nzdU81KQY+w9bc7F/nZ2YR7jqEGrzJeK72XUn4z65qwMNNPxQyNJf7rbUmHYIK2NWE O7y44xRFrDUnD6TiX+lG0EiEYMqV8HOOeX4izKhlS/EmmMB83s38lpebZIaps/M4TCQl E40sFgrEKid/58EV3/3Sz3Gg3nSTJsuRNIILy+YAKVlabtT7SGKyyudAl690IYtRBmny KCtKlirIL+Lq11bBVI4TPqhwAyv5ZwEPsl47/e0B4HQkJtBKVf3RHdpN/AD4oQxyHNwC zMjuqaXZQYFGHSe3jCaVu+15u/Jz0Ycw2zygo7wKLs/uP50Gc0bieAsMj5gCx6F25dn/ p6Nw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q7bOxhypfy7ZtYeGibQ+3v+cLl6BnKl4sLEbK27IWKA=; b=R3ogNr5kRGNLTLntiMBFI3/ww+BCxcGnfPp6rH+p5NBEuvxn2B10kKXXJWjvhp2rX7 aUFpn59aZBeQ3/drgZAFtHQllYtCt7AWnaZ/v+XgjSKeyTi7roM+0yG3OmAyIp7vukag AXNqRybFBfMVOoq0J8vZ0C0/x5ARRoJyNYy7eOnj9Du5aLwnFB3giqHlCnKfmxeZSoF6 fp7F6l0vcp7s0SzxoAkCpxgqtTTuynj6XED/NC9T8t5l/VtngPa5VFYpOlJwzmcdVAsu KAIu6LYtZNO4rNxVAeaheqzL/7Jp4lfKnYENDuPqu1CrBQlu5Hd5i0MwjavKvoXCaN33 WtUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWogsJUOXsEX/ARqZ5d48NHPzHVXtM4j5Jk2PDvv1Mv6dU0zY8A MvtNTxisOK3mkzvnU8HyQOIx4gDi3iw2tYHHwS0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAykk3nM2JTykro7joNwiPvnBnJB7ubz/2epBRnY3b3a191CguxUeO5lFP3Hi40FS9f68HOVDUFQuDd9yZjQpM=
X-Received: by 10.99.149.66 with SMTP id t2mr9067496pgn.105.1508175496635; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.161.137 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9386ECB6-F33F-4E9A-B1DD-739750E13268@juniper.net>
References: <4dbd7011-ea7c-137f-7413-a6665ecc0f94@labn.net> <55D8FF3C-4A73-41D8-84FD-77952970BB91@juniper.net> <CY4PR05MB3079854C13761FD04166B589D0710@CY4PR05MB3079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <a658a41b719c4bc8b5e1f17a53f95296@XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com> <9386ECB6-F33F-4E9A-B1DD-739750E13268@juniper.net>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:38:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTvPtq_hTAxkdp4UpxxiCTSfLrtii760jW1d4EAdwze6Fw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec@ietf.org
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1b3acebc68d2055bad78a3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/OGU9qywwY2Jj_H860tI5CYjL9BM>
Subject: [Teas] Fwd: FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-01
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:38:20 -0000

{ plus teas }

Fwding Siva's response to the list.

Regards,
-Pavan


On 10/11/17, 10:50 PM, "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" <msiva@cisco.com> wrote:

>I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft.
>
>Thanks,
>Siva
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sudharsana Venkataraman [mailto:sudharsana@juniper.net]
>Sent: Friday, October 6, 2017 7:08 PM
>To: Harish Sitaraman <hsitaraman@juniper.net>; Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>;
Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>; inaminei@google.com; Siva
Sivabalan (msiva) <msiva@cisco.com>
>Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
>Subject: RE: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-01
>
>Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.
>Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.
>
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
3A__datatracker.ietf.org_ipr_2827_&d=DwIFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-
ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CFHVfW0WsgxSqM6wTJiWE5evUJAdlUl1fm7E0WVbiS8&m=-
ZTdWKZQO36h1rxn8v0Xl8cMgKztFoSlcfkVFKzq-DM&s=U5ifDgZlRXbDD2BI8_tCu9Y0-
sUVinsEOQM8p1GsJ44&e=
>
>
>Sudha
>
>
>
>On 10/6/17, 12:38 PM, "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>Authors, Contributors, WG,
>>
>>As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>>
>>Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>>
>>Please state either:
>>
>>"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>>or
>>"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>
>>If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>>(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>>
>>If yes to the above, please state either:
>>
>>"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>>or
>>"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>
>>If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>>appropriate.
>>
>>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>>above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>>aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>>stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>>contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
>>TO LINES.
>>
>>If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
>>listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations
>>under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you
>>are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>>participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>>undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>>and
>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
3A__trac.tools.ietf.org_group_iesg_trac_wiki_IntellectualProperty&d=DwICaQ&
c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CXKOXD_
3UIPrRhmyXS8lTOnJ2ZY8S-bng806Yu9IBa0&m=Pywa-FBPyN7utYVOxLoJmDQN1fv1yRnAllj
-o5CDC_o&s=ZWlvBVCUsAuhrelVtyCvDjVunwt1ApZJfjwRMde6HR4&e= .
>>
>>Thank you,
>>TEAS WG Chairs
>>
>>PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
>>response.
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Teas mailing list
>Teas@ietf.org
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_
listinfo_teas&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=
XddBHkWMeR1b-aj4-V7cNRCnMNCAWiW6Zu2PuMB6NpM&m=eR_
x96suSIkr4ep7MsQumsHUyQKlt10v1F1CDtl4r8w&s=ybTgXwWGieYPl1RgcNcRiHMepwFtVX
-TlByS7nbirKo&e=