Re: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Mon, 25 January 2021 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66E73A0D5C; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:09:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rAGHad2N2wA4; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-m17638.qiye.163.com (mail-m17638.qiye.163.com [59.111.176.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58BB73A0D47; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:09:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP2IOH5QC (unknown [219.142.69.75]) by mail-m17638.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 353921C01A0; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:09:33 +0800 (CST)
From: "Aijun Wang" <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: "'Rob Wilton \(rwilton\)'" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "'The IESG'" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org>, <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, <teas@ietf.org>, <lberger@labn.net>
References: <161122320617.9473.15706741821701705911@ietfa.amsl.com> <006a01d6f05d$5fadf8b0$1f09ea10$@tsinghua.org.cn> <MN2PR11MB4366586888EEA4E5E95E3366B5A09@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4366586888EEA4E5E95E3366B5A09@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:09:32 +0800
Message-ID: <00be01d6f2c7$81342420$839c6c60$@tsinghua.org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: zh-cn
Thread-Index: AQGrQPRBSEzVeu9Pb6FhyXQkF2bdzgI7M30FAq6vyOKqZ70qIA==
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgYFAkeWUFZS1VLWVdZKFlBSkxLS0o3V1ktWUFJV1 kPCRoVCBIfWUFZSB5KH0gYQk9DGh8fVkpNSkpOT09KTEhPQk1VEwETFhoSFyQUDg9ZV1kWGg8SFR 0UWUFZT0tIVUpKS0NISFVLWQY+
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6Pkk6CBw*FD8JKTksPg8zQwsI MCxPFDZVSlVKTUpKTk9PSkxIQ0xMVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxOWVdZCAFZQU5PTE83Bg++
X-HM-Tid: 0a7737849b62d993kuws353921c01a0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Oljn93RIMnAUWtF-O8WoLK8ebZk>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 03:09:40 -0000

Hi, Rob:

Thanks for your comments. How about to add the following subsection:

Section 7.5 E2E Path Performance Monitoring:
It is necessary to deploy the corresponding E2E path performance monitoring
mechanism to keep assure that the delay, jitter or packet loss index meet
the original path performance aim.  The performance monitoring results
should feedback to the PCE to let it accomplish the re-optimize process,
send the update control message to related PCC if necessary. Traditional OAM
methods(ping, trace) can be used.

Or, would you like to give other suggestions?

Best Regards

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

-----Original Message-----
From: teas-bounces@ietf.org <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rob Wilton
(rwilton)
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 6:23 PM
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>cn>; 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org;
teas@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net
Subject: Re: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on
draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)

Hi Aijun,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Aijun Wang
> Sent: 22 January 2021 01:25
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>om>; 'The IESG' 
> <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org; 
> teas@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net
> Subject: Re: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on 
> draft-ietf-teas-pce-
> native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Hi, Robert:
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: teas-bounces@ietf.org <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of 
> Robert Wilton via Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 6:00 PM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org; 
> teas@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net
> Subject: [Teas] Robert Wilton's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all 
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut 
> this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It might be helpful if this document had a short section covering 
> operational considerations for monitoring and managing TE traffic when 
> being deployed in this way.
> [WAJ] You mean Path/Application performance monitoring? It is the 
> traditional OAM methods that the operators are all familiar with.
[RW]
Yes.  If the same tools work and can be used then that sounds good.  It
might still be worth having a section that describes that, even if it ends
up being just a paragraph.

Regards,
Rob


> 
> Regards,
> Rob
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas