[Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Wed, 21 October 2015 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6AF1ACE1F for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VDxowq9yAIF9 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA2C91A873D for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2278; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445457146; x=1446666746; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+hWKwDVC2wzOEan8KXRs9qBNYy7HGGRxHf9wzCCzQEE=; b=KkzyHc5x/avUQ4W/QW7k8d4tDeXEg93iVLYE6XjSVtzPXESABB87RGDU GI70o5JZ71axDyUXQKeWhsJ82ExiCs+0dIfBjDph2TRejYgWry4+MCh7V Js0azJSw9pUfW3ucyg+EVT5zOnAnKt6SVBa1bbeoYUQ9SVk2WqQmjqLyW o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D6AQCt7CdW/5BdJa1dgzZUbwa+DgENgVkXCoV8AoFJOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqELgEBAQQBAQE3NAYFEAIBCBgeECcLGwEGAwIEDgUIiCgNxDoBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYhneEfoQqEQFRB4QuBZYnAYUYh36BX0iDd5Ibg28BHwEBQoQDcgGFAjqBBgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,178,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="200401048"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2015 19:52:25 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9LJqPax019719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:52:26 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:52:06 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:52:06 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity
Thread-Index: AQHRCf+WdE08PsV6KEyi25JQ2mBGVZ5zNOSAgAALEICAAx/O8A==
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:52:06 +0000
Message-ID: <1913c0822dfc41469732c45e837092f8@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <56242FE6.5080202@labn.net> <5624FE3D.80408@alcatel-lucent.com> <A46D9C092EA46F489F135060986AD9FF222062DE@G4W3293.americas.hpqcorp.net>
In-Reply-To: <A46D9C092EA46F489F135060986AD9FF222062DE@G4W3293.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.48]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/OuhuoL8vbFVG1AiIkxnhNLdd5Eo>
Cc: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
Subject: [Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:52:28 -0000

[fwding to see if this response goes into the list archive this time]


Hi

Yes I'm aware of IPR that applies to the draft. The IPR that I'm aware of has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules. 

Regards,
Don 
> 
> On 19.10.2015 01:48, Lou Berger wrote:
> > Authors, Contributors, WG,
> >
> > As part of the preparation for WG La
> >
> > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> >
> > Please state either:
> >
> > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> > or
> > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >
> > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
> > (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> >
> > If yes to the above, please state either:
> >
> > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> > or
> > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >
> > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think 
> > appropriate.
> >
> > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer 
> > the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not 
> > you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to 
> > the next stage until a response has been received from each author 
> > and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN 
> > THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> >
> > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not 
> > listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your 
> > obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify 
> > the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, 
> > or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion 
> > related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see 
> > the RFCs listed above and 
> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > TEAS WG Chairs
> >
> > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your 
> > response.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > Teas@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas