Re: [Teas] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)

Aijun Wang <> Thu, 21 January 2021 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26963A1682; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:49:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qg5SaJZmRal3; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:49:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A863A1696; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:49:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP2IOH5QC (unknown []) by (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 4E0281C0094; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:49:15 +0800 (CST)
From: "Aijun Wang" <>
To: "'Murray Kucherawy'" <>, "'The IESG'" <>
Cc: <>, <>, <>, "'Lou Berger'" <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:49:14 +0800
Message-ID: <000001d6ef97$9fbb9820$df32c860$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGokK0x3eadykdzF2I51NB3u/N2O6qODMKQ
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Tid: 0a7722a1a77fd993kuws4e0281c0094
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 01:49:25 -0000

Hi, Murray:

Thanks for your review. I have updated the draft according to your
suggestions. The updated version will be uploaded later, together with
comments from other experts.
Detail responses inline below [WAJ]

Thanks for your efforts.

Best Regards

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

-----Original Message-----
From: <> On Behalf Of Murray
Kucherawy via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 4:48 PM
To: The IESG <>
Cc:;;; Lou Berger <>
Subject: [Teas] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on
draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Just some nits here, adding to what Erik found:

Section 3:

"The topology is comprises four devices ..." should be "The topology is
comprised of four devices ..." or "The topology comprises four devices ..."

In the third bullet: "For example, PF11/PF21 via ..." -- I suggest putting
"send" before "PF11/PF21".
[WAJ] Done

"... achieving the needed QoS assurance ..." -- suggest changing "achieving"
to "satisfying" (since you used "achieve" already in that sentence)
[WAJ] Done

Section 4:

I can't quite parse the first sentence, specifically the end of it.
[WAJ] Change the sentence to " When the priority traffic spans a large scale
network, such as that illustrated in Figure 2, the multiple BGP sessions
cannot be established hop by hop within one AS. For such a scenario, we

Section 5:

"... is as the follows:" -- remove "the"
[WAJ] Done

Section 8:

"... BGP security consideration." -- s/consideration/considerations/

"There will no additional ..." -- add "be" before "no", or change "will" to
[WAJ] Change to "There are no additional..."

Teas mailing list