[Teas] Update on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Fri, 30 October 2015 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F431A6F83 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vrNxGX4pzHxE for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 659591B2D5C for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=600; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1446221057; x=1447430657; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=e/1WfYvEMEqWBCmFufpcXP3PqGQVDCkeHkD7IS09QOw=; b=JQ3xjhPKGFSMEWq98ietk6E5RtE/2WggviNx6u9mz8iVXynHDs1PIiGu FqtmVE3smMyIrNFkLFNSdDMR9zl1j6k8ko0aW5Oo5tG2gNyTD4zCjV/Rq dZVRd0nGQJKuhNufgf0EZ7Mq78QogqIQj38KY2lU8MThigLeqo02GeIyR 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BeBQB9lDNW/5NdJa1egzuBSL85gVqGGYE2ORMBAQEBAQEBgQqEOAQ6PxIBPkImAQQODYgoxD0BAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEchneOPgWWQwF7jCKBYJIPiFEBIgFAhASFaQGBBgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,219,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="203490229"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2015 16:04:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9UG4GjF023726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:04:16 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:03:50 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:03:50 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Update on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect
Thread-Index: AdETLIUP0ayH+lX3Tq2KouV45dvy7Q==
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:03:50 +0000
Message-ID: <581c39f5bba4486c9eb6473d6c518864@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.111]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/PWi1THQBmvAeoT3IBAls3M84Irs>
Cc: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
Subject: [Teas] Update on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:04:18 -0000

A brief update on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect, since we won't be presenting next week.

Markups from the AD review have been done and published, and the document is now in GEN-ART review. There are some comments and nits to be addressed and cleanup/clarification to be done. We also have an open issue regarding whether a SRLG-collection request should be mirrored in the Resv LSP-attributes; we welcome comments on this (or anything else) on the list.

Next steps: complete GEN-ART review and publish updated document version, and then IESG review.

Cheers

Matt