IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] "Packet Network Slicing using Segment Routing"

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 25 March 2019 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D2A12014C for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id psksSxla8nQg for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound-ss-879.bluehost.com (outbound-ss-879.bluehost.com [69.89.30.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1143412001A for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw14.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.14]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F7E1E0CFD for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:30:54 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 8Z3OhXctjXFO58Z3OhDMqI; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:30:54 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KwLl0JVOPwQMr2UMsBsTzDaAftPE426L9Q0kfVtKXm4=; b=zoxGasvSvoKoVQJ9ytay9eck7G E7HtZWmo1An3kl/JE4vQrQdIXfz5k5sbwwuHEYJKmQzsXdpABLD8BCDFhUCLaKtuf/Q+8OYaleBD7 CzRuwi7gWx/hJe+zrwY06hTFZ;
Received: from pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.11.201]:59916 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1h8Z3O-000JYv-6L; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:30:54 -0600
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "draft-peng-lsr-network-slicing@ietf.org" <draft-peng-lsr-network-slicing@ietf.org>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
References: <DB700EDA-6ACF-4B17-9B9A-C5C2939F89D7@cisco.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <728204ac-3c16-6a49-21de-2ad1b62a28ba@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:30:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DB700EDA-6ACF-4B17-9B9A-C5C2939F89D7@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------98B46BE6B3B222A866FBB24D"
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 72.66.11.201
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1h8Z3O-000JYv-6L
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [72.66.11.201]:59916
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 4
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Q5X7XFGfxQaQx4dC_bcpv9kIB4A>
Subject: Re: [Teas] "Packet Network Slicing using Segment Routing"
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:30:59 -0000

Authors, just resubmit with teas in place of lsr, when you do your 
update based on other feedback you received this week.

Thanks,

Lou

(TEAS co-chair)

On 3/25/2019 2:52 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> Hi Authors,
>
> I read this draft on the plane on the way to Prague and I don’t think 
> it belongs in LSR. I believe it belongs in TEAs as it is more about 
> the requirement and framework for TE slicing than it does about adding 
> the Administrative Instance Identifier (AII) to the OSPF and IS-IS TE 
> encodings. We will go forward with the presentation on Thursday with 
> the understanding that LSR will not adopt this work. If it is adopted 
> in TEAS, we can decide whether to proceed with a small LSR draft with 
> just the new AIIs or simply provide review and IANA code points in our 
> registries.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email