Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition-03

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 14 August 2020 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C3D3A11D7; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WSoZaTbFnxIy; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1549E3A11D6; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id ha11so4809801pjb.1; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=mw9BEWzxH6OmRGwcIhfSpqJqbWxRG9nwUhOHHOzdzxc=; b=GSJ6ka5PdErPT1/FqK/wVsmYCHeZOyrspaL4Z+3A9kaXSDiNTZbK+PdojjUGU+nk/q fe0PUIySQOiF82mvoNbweX+Y5+sqS/+mbo09OWARHqq/j7ePMu6bjplPCcHjl1FGV+aZ iKWhtbA2yCgw3ULEYOGf8tvZGTDJ7eRGxvDbRI+kZltLjNLrG/114zy/MsWRUCLuO9wV 3THcL3Cbc+tIhb/Gj6LnJhviZOw1D+whAsCEWuD4F7SQiIqbxeRLyIT3eOn3mMJ4EmIF YDrS9tQz5WJfMiMDZRNUmMuvVaulq3REQM1dI9aYfYPKfDEXxAxgkPUc/bhU/0ink4rr zISQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=mw9BEWzxH6OmRGwcIhfSpqJqbWxRG9nwUhOHHOzdzxc=; b=F+v/fIsYUgzAjh68mPplf84FQQn97H6cT9C7Nkymh1ucNRM6JwK7iTqtxO13O3ccAB Fvuvc8b6eBhkCPy2V9MuSqCwBTeKsCUBgvxvjo/ng/xor54juHRSH0ujXC4Al+j3TSgZ F75W7xYju8JC7CxAt1W776QtMqTP1Xk4s6DXwU2LNepvxVsGeRjT3wlMY3eFGKlPo+MY oeX8awobHvkPEj4wSNg/ib+ds0r+vDvVQUwfobGe2MkvWbyjh6vHvGBrd4edwTFVS2Ny 2OETkFavuoQxTvlJtTjm6moociXokAyhcG7AV4HpTlW+qBX7UaPHFNVE4k5uEu0YQeGU JBHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+Ab0eDaELE1QsrRC3L+zRblUg+hq4chbpT28SzZ04lMsKtSwf g8m3NzTiDvvIWcxB8KAL8ws=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlnQezEZdB5woVdEh4IpZ+6N39QmbAQ1JjLLpps8IsxNT5+wh+w8BKq7rLTcy6JYMRTv7qVQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bb81:: with SMTP id v1mr3314767pjr.168.1597431310610; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x136sm9834721pfc.28.2020.08.14.11.55.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 11:54:59 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "=?utf-8?Q?Rokui=2C_Reza_(Nokia_-_CA/Ottawa)?=" <reza.rokui@nokia.com>, shunsuke.homma.ietf@gmail.com, kiranm@futurewei.com, luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, Igor Bryskin <i_bryskin@yahoo.com>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <96fc86fc-9de2-4116-b883-621f9548c186@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <C9DEBE1FE74D8C25.985c9dae-b4c4-4ecf-9d7f-d8152ea82e33@mail.outlook.com>
References: <CA+YzgTu5F9+HVa3gW6VmT-Nr3douz1MHSEwx-DhAX6ea6xFCmg@mail.gmail.com> <C9DEBE1FE74D8C25.985c9dae-b4c4-4ecf-9d7f-d8152ea82e33@mail.outlook.com>
X-Readdle-Message-ID: 96fc86fc-9de2-4116-b883-621f9548c186@Spark
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5f36de0b_77465f01_1640"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/QSAyD0Z-XjGQhT6armnnKpNo8sI>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-nsdt-teas-transport-slice-definition-03
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 18:55:13 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Cheers,
Jeff
On Aug 14, 2020, 8:06 AM -0700, Igor Bryskin <i_bryskin@yahoo.com>om>, wrote:
> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
>
> Igor
>
> Get Outlook for Android
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 9:24 AM -0400, "Vishnu Pavan Beeram" <vishnupavan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Authors, Contributors, WG,
> > >
> > > As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:
> > >
> > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> > >
> > >   Please state either:
> > >
> > >   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> > >   or
> > >   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> > >
> > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> > > (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> > >
> > > If yes to the above, please state either:
> > >
> > >   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> > >   or
> > >   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> > >
> > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> > >   appropriate.
> > >
> > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> > > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> > > aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> > > stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> > > contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> > > MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> > >
> > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> > > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> > > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> > > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> > > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> > > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> > > and
> > > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Pavan and Lou