[Teas] Update on <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec>
Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Fri, 15 July 2016 00:13 UTC
Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F106012D52C; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nl7D8jszNIBF; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67EA012D90E; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j126so80091393vkg.3; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nXcgAPUv6iBD6cmk2YY7CnHf3WR+XuFVYHKTSZp2/zc=; b=MBI0nl6Z6UqyJhumICjDRUi6Qam8tqVuPJtjOF05c4ZZ8xfMQrlnEGmMSiIP/7hG+4 THAEn1xDJE+BagDhFFKGkxZLkK2H+M+qPRGQjjSLhmi9Xo4xjUQc7Y4bCQERzoKdMDgn f6wKixojSigJapouO8I/9Foht1YQtmdm3fHcxJfd3vZlcGdtUU0xfOQvsraPhlhGUaUx 8YR7ssRURh49RPNooHikQ5xewOykZSy8Z+3qcfTflWA1dJruHr8QTVj6ceXtX6h0VvnG AEHC3LOy9oMig9JOAczaKnOFHxYFCE2z++ioadUYz3uH33Ln9yQTdBtJAFnwdjhfgnFd XWKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nXcgAPUv6iBD6cmk2YY7CnHf3WR+XuFVYHKTSZp2/zc=; b=AyxPfnY6pKLMSOH4Ez5hTCAi+DpVYkqIJcnbEMBLx6IdUzS2Sz4/clMNNEQ8sLpogz Q13tRTgPdQelXPrFVTCvabY+Ov7/ukXIK/4T315uvVno/YkdiH+0GOUxvtHT80LYRWCu GYERtjRTv0jVdzFHizoNaUiR2OS1bt1FckUIVXjdbAwoAEtB+rWmixDqPDaAMKeVY8xu ucBc1cEBk8YsbztXfXTX18BUvxvT56bnxbfVu4C/aZU+STG6zWgoH4WEfG/2LcxI2jSS nh75wBRBosJYzWU6DBzTCvz1Km6dMYx4TzjQ9A5AQuCBSmxwKtXkBxDftUT6Ps6e6kT2 gzYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKkuz75PApS569DHQHHoPLKbUhwrV2Hhtb/mJaO4fdlumb/qLLHQgtXlcv2kd1DwTNGijYawavKpv4PQg==
X-Received: by 10.31.149.213 with SMTP id x204mr9028068vkd.71.1468541601340; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.154.66 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 20:13:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTsvLJb+HfTKnmteJWKJ93HkkP3UQtuT1xOYj8VBXHCKtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141f6967c63f70537a17c2a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/R5LprSAEvkaRGc97KMJYtWrZC4c>
Subject: [Teas] Update on <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec>
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:13:26 -0000
WG, Hi!
The following is a short update on this WG draft:
- Current Status:
- No update since the last IETF.
- Open Issues:
- Received comments from the chair (Lou) in recent weeks:
- Major comment: "Consider splitting the document into two - one
for RI-RSVP and the other for Per-Peer Flow Control".
- Next Steps:
- Address Lou's comments and request WG LC.
Regards,
- Pavan (On behalf of the authors/contributors)
- [Teas] Update on <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- [Teas] Update on <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling… Vishnu Pavan Beeram