[Teas] TEAS interim meeting (Oct 19th) - Cancellation

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Sat, 17 October 2020 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC833A0AB3; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQtM1efJj-gH; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AE2A3A0AB2; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id u19so7278837ion.3; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jhePg5O3vI8R3TaCJoaDSsWaM8SAw0/+v/m3ROdibt8=; b=ckWLTcR7D8CzPP+unVGfWhlEWXJ6WxMFWQD7y0LzJ16aWHOLq9btiJq5uPii2bwtN7 Ambeeb7+m9d+BSD4S0G0NmuAu63fOcCIoB3h9SyHwjFZhAqgrGN87LpamIT/uH+r7CKI cPCn81OILOAApz9I2+jdGzDkbovCZ4mx0ALwkPkW3bQ5ItnJGbJVi5stMyWlDyvLomMW bbN6CG218kBrQ/PjZvPze0YjY4KFe32I1Cq1X9WdtTH1v/FayFgsP+6o48gom2BTHs1n f1+t2PPRen21F6kaPFoaYypJf9k/iZ4gdaGsKTsBDdNhVO9sVlP7eU/OwlEdrK82YRaO RMKA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jhePg5O3vI8R3TaCJoaDSsWaM8SAw0/+v/m3ROdibt8=; b=DlndLz98rZFEGUeBw2DafAas9//Jru6Uc6qXnk57MwEHUH4ANsSsylIV8VUXwXIsmp bgdfzY81XQR2Y3oJiZcgQCDTrWOmGAQa168VX0mw9pbzCSd9BjM9NyUzjYykV0fYJt2V G95Xe8bIwrc4UhiHkmuNQVvs2CgELVBliw/YdWHcOhcdlo+u/oRqMDACHsxFwd4wl8Lf YrQ5MQgnpCsk9DT7V6KN+4uJfRzYFirvnK0jeBr2Xa/hnTpbh5jZgzw7mXvXxsO8ZhC3 H4ZrgeucTcPEcZ8swhAYkO608Wtdl2ZWbZBI1/1/sfm/MrtvMmVxj+CC5jXO0/imEN9Z 5QxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530gFEJY1Ygniy8+3YnFMlRd/OFpvZnhXEwaRYz0UFwCQYGFP+So pG3foRmVj85Rztwn+I2GTQ9Ls1xIthiZhphZV8G6yjFWUNz5dyP0
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbFKk+4/SqjvU8+4kwWTYxTQvezN2bNgnsRS1LksGHaMwPUYPRa/n06PZMVv3iyJbcETMbZUNKRWhBlFkZuNs=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c608:: with SMTP id i8mr6009058jan.42.1602936555630; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 07:09:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTsPSgecHWqxg6rpSFesdHyTZWBugAVp-njY5tfMC0ZfoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fefdba05b1dcbfac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/RHmzimc4LsAIdr-Dfa6gIfS_FLU>
Subject: [Teas] TEAS interim meeting (Oct 19th) - Cancellation
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 12:09:18 -0000

WG,

We are canceling the TEAS interim meeting that was slated for Oct 19th.
This meeting was meant for discussing the two NSDT documents. We were
hoping to review an updated version of the documents addressing the
comments received on the list during the adoption poll, but the revised
documents are not yet ready.

We note that one of the major discussion topics, i.e., the “naming” issue,
has been resolved on the list (Thanks to everyone who helped in running
this down!). We request the DT/authors to send an update to the list
regarding their plans for resolving the other open items and updating the
documents.

Regards,
-Pavan and Lou