[Teas] Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-28: (with COMMENT)

Gunter Van de Velde via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 10 June 2024 08:52 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gunter Van de Velde via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171800952201.4833.8962838012794832262@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 01:52:02 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: 5F4WIZLC6OZSIDB6HNYM56T7PYYUUA6W
CC: draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang@ietf.org, teas-chairs@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, vbeeram@juniper.net
Reply-To: Gunter Van de Velde <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Subject: [Teas] Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-28: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/RwAaox9r3Y9pNgaUHJLXMPRJiBs>

Gunter Van de Velde has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-28: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Gunter Van de Velde, RTG AD, comments for draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-27

Please find https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
documenting the handling of ballots.

Many thanks for the RTG-DIR reviews from Darren Dukes and many thanks to Vishnu
Pavan Beeram for the Shepherd write-up.

Please find below historical ABSTAIN AD review comments with information how
the document editor team quickly worked to resolve these abstain observations.

#ABSTAIN items
#=============
##(resolved) ABSTAIN1
One of the motivations to use YANG is to have human readable structure to
understand config and state of a device. When looking through the document i
see many very abbreviated acronyms. e.g. vn, vn-id, src, src-vn-ap.id, etc

##[Resolution] Agreed with Dhruv (author): abbreviations will be expanded upon
in descriptions as the abbreviations used are well known in TEAS area.

##[resolved] ABSTAIN2
Using full/fragments of parent-node names in sibling-node names is something
that netmod has recommendations against. Reference:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-20#section-4.3.1

##[Resolution] Authors updated the model to align with netmod recommendations

[Teas] Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draf… Gunter Van de Velde via Datatracker