IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Advancing some documents

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 24 June 2016 12:41 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E2212D979 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWKpQmWMYrKN for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B0B8712DA2A for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17807 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jun 2016 12:41:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Jun 2016 12:41:48 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw3 with id Achk1t00Z2SSUrH01chnul; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:41:47 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=KpLehwmN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=pD_ry4oyNxEA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=AEDFM0qtAAAA:8 a=TzQ2zJoWdMPxYhrrCVoA:9 a=NqMR105DNE4E-Yly:21 a=zafA8-QdtfKezfJe:21 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=Yz9wTY_ffGCQnEDHKrcv:22 a=NCq4FBG6EvGFEERSFaZp:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=2cq14G9OXglAHYuDQ7AycHLRcjnGGusoiA4xXHQqnOs=; b=bkix6fUBcVbm+awE8vMVWgs/us xmsleb6I+utrvoXBrSrcU/d81dpbFUvnsX/ND8mfpKGCYQ2mEveumYQEWCptAOG3s34ecEUy+LrNW S92XVzqivTIjB6+MosfO/aR+n;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:50527 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1bGQQa-0000MU-IF; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 06:41:44 -0600
To: "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
References: <118601d1bbe7$f97eeee0$ec7ccca0$@olddog.co.uk> <8f320642-5265-0e70-3384-f51189b5aa38@labn.net> <CADOd8-ss5h8Gxisk-h=2G9jpS9NT5ngjdSXnubzaUadeixsqrQ@mail.gmail.com> <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BD0B9FD@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <9cf55776-62ab-16ce-8804-136a194fe530@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 08:41:37 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BD0B9FD@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/SMN6Lefya2AI1ZMhtn-eriJ0BXM>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Advancing some documents
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:41:55 -0000

Hi,

    So Pavan and I were hoping for more discussion, but given past face
to face and list comments, we think it's worth polling
pce-control-function.  -- I'll start the poll process in a moment...

Lou (and Pavan)


On 6/15/2016 12:48 PM, King, Daniel wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>  
>
> Just like to echo Cyril’s comments that the PCE-based control
> architecture is a really interesting topic and the authors have done
> great job of documenting recent discussions on and off the PCE list.
>
>  
>
> The current open source SDN controller platforms already implement
> some basic PCE architecture and PCEP extensions, but there is growing
> trend for more capability (TE automation, optimisation and resiliency)
> to be enabled using PCEP. Having this document that summarises
> architecture, applicability and capability - and possible gaps - is
> very useful. I would also like to see the document progress in the
> TEAS WG.
>
>                                                                                                                                                                                                        
>
>
> BR, Dan.
>
>  
>
> *From:*Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Cyril Margaria
> *Sent:* 15 June 2016 14:39
> *To:* Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> *Cc:* 'Adrian Farrel' (adrian@olddog.co.uk) <adrian@olddog.co.uk>;
> teas-chairs@ietf.org; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Teas] Advancing some documents
>
>  
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I am supporting the draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function dcocument and
> look forward to see it progress in the WG.
> This is a good summary of the current architectures and discussions.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Cyril
>
>  
>
>  
>
> On 3 June 2016 at 18:46, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net
> <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
>
>     Adrian,
>
>     Thanks question, see below.
>
>
>     On 6/1/2016 5:28 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>     > Hi chairs,
>     >
>     > I think there are a few drafts that have been discussed on the
>     mailing list and
>     > which the authors believe are within scope for TEAS and would be
>     better
>     > progressed if adopted by the Working Group. Of course, all of
>     these can continue
>     > to be consolidated and are open for review and discussions on
>     the mailing list,
>     > but if you are able to share a plan for these documents that
>     would be helpful:
>     > Is anything further needed from the authors before these can
>     advance?
>     >
>     > draft-ceccarelli-teas-actn-framework
>     A poll on this will be out shortly.
>     > draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
>     It would be good to get a little more on this one from the WG --
>     either
>     on list or in session. We individually are supportive of the work and
>     look forward to seeing in pursued in the WG.
>
>     > draft-zhuang-teas-scheduled-resources
>     The merges look good - but there's only been a few comments on the
>     list
>     since it was updated.  So this falls into the same boat as the prior
>     draft. - We'd like to hear more from the WG before polling.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Lou and Pavan
>
>     > Thanks,
>     > Adrian
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Teas mailing list
>     > Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>     >
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Teas mailing list
>     Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email