Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo

Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 06 May 2020 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53653A0C0B for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bg_KriYOQ0zN for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D44653A0C05 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id c18so3491413ile.5 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 May 2020 16:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AlJP+bgiUssmUI8zGZY4USZr/2X3n/8680VEkq+TVwk=; b=VLz+qq1WPzm+GkGrinW19q8HOdO3HcURGspqLPWFHzMFTVW/I76gRr26nFp1VF1Jdp mDUloBwk8YuACM29zr+uE5jY2o0Q+7exSL9fbSqN3/5IYIQXWBAuFckd5Kzj/hHxNn+i f/IAa/TSwhtwm3q0c9gUjBxnChtkF+8S7VSoxb87yCLwCrwpXICNUYAvbO0OvzXsf3m7 HOok7uVD3IIChoCgXnGFb988/dzNbwaLL7htEf73iycF356W40k+v5pYD/oEgxjw+1sh ZfWJhvTnS4L+An7En2Jx0AsVjnP4KQBMFEJz5jDpX/adHyGeHJJJn/jleF3pegX4gWjA rNvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AlJP+bgiUssmUI8zGZY4USZr/2X3n/8680VEkq+TVwk=; b=NtIkInHddNeLSVoK+/ayw/w0pxjscfUv9ih/okFgmeiGB4VD6a329D0VV/V9J6v1zD MEJxcAMiMBRphECEkyJnjsOMO00kSF4p6H3A9+OBeJ66cFzOYEeg3Wb/UMYLXm9hTLSj HSdqxjk89xQHHcY8glZnN5kV7wtAYYcV8psVUVvHZAABrPgYOg5ofpJaEHJXABiIwBkh tKsHQDaLN0H7jHWGZSnsBSFIVXqKQDY1d+0ktKAVhCIAa3PoOZHha3D8/ZWPH1eVrlF8 IdI3jXbbRsqddtNDLlFghXWQesu4DiMVOtOX+wALYsWB9Hf4kfCdc8i/lRRj8YqvcdCt 5PXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Puap9h6QLYfZ0fhZ3awk3CKkvSYq96iS5p44aXr76rZmKSZLtDZi ZJgBQ2aKm5/VkrLW1Z5o0uO7Z+5waM5F36W0qVI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ3pE5PuOUy4tbrQ8RPE8NN29HQc4n9bfApxSjG6//hCn2CdogOYJLhv3ie9BygvJE4YdzEEhqFTju70ZT2/is=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:498d:: with SMTP id k13mr11217490ilg.216.1588807362848; Wed, 06 May 2020 16:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEz6PPQC8NUnTimMVXBXzbd9+FxdeTDV8NXPuLDASBF=1YUR_A@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB53406ABD74B3CEE15B5952BDA2AB0@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB53406ABD74B3CEE15B5952BDA2AB0@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 19:22:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEz6PPS-ZWSb7cubv2jB05ZCb9kyyGXDPd5KpAQ05iHmtpMpCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007aabc905a5030ac1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/T6aFahGQCuRw8uB4i2BttPg95c0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 23:22:46 -0000

Hi Tom,

Thanks for reviewing and sorry about the errors. We have posted an updated
version https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo-07, to
fix the errors about the augmentation description and to rephrase a couple
of sections to explain the relations between the related models and their
objects. Please let us know for anything that is not clear enough.

Thanks,
- Xufeng

On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:56 AM tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:

> From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Xufeng Liu <
> xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
> Sent: 21 April 2020 21:09
>
>
> Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo
>
> Current Status:
>
>   *  The updated revision -06 was posted on March 8, 2020:
>      - Editorial changes.
>   *  Corordinated with ietf-eth-te-topology and ietf-te-mpls-tp-topo
>      for the augmentation of ietf-te-topology
>      - ietf-te-topology does not need to be changed.
>   *  Answered YANG doctor's review comments.
>
> Open Issues:
>
>   *   None.
>
> <tp>
>
> I started  to review this and have given up,  I cannot make sense of
> section 2, which I see as fundamental to understanding the I-D.
>  Thus
> The YANG modulues  ietf-l3-te-topology ...
> These two modules augment ietf-l3-te topology
> No they don't!  This augments
> ietf-l3-unicast-topology
> which is quite different and I find this confusion elsewhere in section
> two. Thus
> Relationship  between Layer 3 Topology and TE Topology
> Is that Layer 3 TE Topology or ietf-network-topology?  I think that many
> if not most  references to TE Topology are ambiguous and need clarifying -
> is the reference to Layer 3 TE Topology to  ietf-network-topology?
>
> Some of the words are quirky and this website is determined not to let me
> put them into an e-mail but here goes.
>
> modulues
> topoology
> moducment
> Local ink
>
> Tom Petch
> Next Steps:
>
>
>   *  Update the model to sync with the referenced models like
> draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types if there are any changes.
>   *  Welcome further reviews and suggestions.
>   *  Working Group Last Call after completing the above.
>
> Thanks,
> - Xufeng
>