IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Thu, 28 September 2017 12:33 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0E1134705; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 05:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8NmaQTCgIPth; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 05:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631AA134684; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 05:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7006; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1506602008; x=1507811608; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=dUML2cw2T4AUOKitSfv9gHpTzqrdRNYw5gDwwSbKOUg=; b=kcf/LUntGwJU9PLkVMxT0zuFUIMkZVGrLbLWg+QT96vbomTT/H5uY420 zDcAF/YNg/WJTNzIiqdguKvFnmZPVQ9mX+ywHPNreBKm9OlnJFVUw1YKs fJUCN3YCS36w6f3sEaga1elxZ7wLRbMkNz6UGgDKssjHZkoshNdz9RfRA M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BjAwDr68xZ/4QNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm9tZG4nB4NxmX6BVIhkiCuHUAqFOwIahAZXAQIBAQEBAQJrKIUZBiNWEAIBCD8DAgICHxEUEQIEDgUfiS5MAxWmdIInJ4cSDYM7AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYMrggKBUYIVC4Jygl6FOS+CMQWYUYgbPAKPZYR5ghOFbosFihCCXIg0AhEZAYE4AVeBDngVWwGFPIFOdod1gRABAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,450,1500940800"; d="scan'208,217";a="9359576"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Sep 2017 12:33:22 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8SCXLPu016695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:33:21 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:33:21 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:33:21 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTNgpbko1OJyOl2Ea54AwTMadvWaLJ+OiAgABXtQA=
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:33:21 +0000
Message-ID: <7F5E6E3A-04DA-4960-94C2-7E66F960C426@cisco.com>
References: <150634961899.27517.2676098033688714820.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+YzgTuB3XCgw03Vsx8dHH2NeQEeitdJSV0Na_+CZ6QJS4QJpA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTuB3XCgw03Vsx8dHH2NeQEeitdJSV0Na_+CZ6QJS4QJpA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.25.0.170815
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7F5E6E3A04DA496094C27E66F960C426ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/TO1HWWO9h4AdgDD4j7pnQP6511E>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:33:31 -0000

Pavan:

Hi!

Thanks for the update!

Maybe a nit, but I think it would be good to explicitly state that the rfc2961 recommendation by themselves won’t do much.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On 9/27/17, 11:19 PM, "Vishnu Pavan Beeram" <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> wrote:


(1) This document seems to do two things: make a series of rfc2961
recommendations, and introduce a couple of new techniques.  What is not clear
to me is whether the first part is independent of the second.  Will the
implementation of Section 2.1. ("RFC2961 Specific" Recommendations) provide
scaling benefits on their own (i.e. without the new techniques)?  If so, please
add some text (maybe in the Introduction) to indicate that.

[VPB] The implementation of the RFC2961 specific recommendations (Section 2 in rev -07) alone will not provide any significant improvement to the existing scaling numbers.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email