Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04

Shunsuke Homma <s.homma0718@gmail.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <s.homma0718@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139653A12A2; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TwA7oeuSNxHw; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x134.google.com (mail-il1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CEB3A12A4; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x134.google.com with SMTP id r13so8673796iln.0; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GC4iwAqJloFfrotKO4zDZAw+NoLBBQcp3iQ6766DYx0=; b=DtjBT9LGvC+6Qv6n4/9kyUhR+KCWgLlWBnztDuVAkCSp+FOCBr0XETJcKm+8sxkRd0 KXifY/2iL4WwFg2HpWklfsbS2VEa8Ew0tXknIbKIXl2lmbBKb7OrIrNQli1Pit3IGqBD cxq6WpfzHt8/kP4kxaqZF5YwFx4bY4U2M7gj8CFPJ+kqAd2V8b2ffdmeqHaKYapMdQz0 /VkdH+QrE+7VEfB53va0RHdz0AVRD+PXo/50U/KESKw94OobHAKB8ARzNz3u8yk5l7fc VPvoGN8PDtTLlzkPAbrzew/wLMlnxYVPRpQ/Xs74V5P1qMEhagagFptL05iKVsOck/Gm rjLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GC4iwAqJloFfrotKO4zDZAw+NoLBBQcp3iQ6766DYx0=; b=BzNakBw5JaTlD3eG6b6OxfBXNOiMq7HKXSaEXLviuHWnwXA11rILDNXtTLnrq7oXpC 51ADOpL2Dow3aZbghOngNW8TvUL63lQiBDqB3j727Q3AVeYBjh43d7yjHf1XHUS5mR/A 5EuJXDpdzANaMQ01A7PHgtF4vCgmKQ6GZuhyA7rF7ezXTZYsD3WZU4RhyGQb1mnjsg41 53sDPHb87S7ZBrzJB1fla6XTSoD89jEsFLluoLTz/wM7GBvE2MlHxMvp9QBOQK95V4lu 6seTg5Xbb+LSBtj5SXZ/A3gIxiZpoqgCCoaZtSymfpwg5oUkM61ZsWIhCmVzqPiOFUas uJqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531333uOripA2V6CiJp+oGLcM6PAwEipq/OInyYmMnICjTmBSMJp Bk5PcTVw1dTt+jGHfVYM7wv+dnRYRj0Al+3GbN0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYfjaUObnyeSq+CJ4DoRmjVXfTqMzHCYDXUh2ePJzPIveWog3/38bBDfAUbSFQW64/nl2YmN1bWiRdjD/qQLk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:42:: with SMTP id i2mr11033907ilr.184.1597624419054; Sun, 16 Aug 2020 17:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7603d242-a67b-7d68-bfeb-8da70b9b9c88@labn.net> <CAB75xn6kRM7At0m3L8f+L8EP8xDXq7kKvRt-8_H3bA=5zRMvFw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn6kRM7At0m3L8f+L8EP8xDXq7kKvRt-8_H3bA=5zRMvFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shunsuke Homma <s.homma0718@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:33:28 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGU6MPecmgu2A+hDWzfkG-kVoLi0Waep9MQVSB6XxiC-By42YA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com>, Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Rokui, Reza (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <reza.rokui@nokia.com>, Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fb77db05ad07eb39"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/TyOrVwpN4QN6zIGn0o_0lu3lP60>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:33:42 -0000

Hi,


"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"


Regards,


Shunsuke

2020年8月15日(土) 14:56 Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>om>:

> Hi Lou,
>
>  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 6:51 PM Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> >
> > Authors, Contributors, WG,
> >
> > As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:
> >
> > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> >
> >    Please state either:
> >
> >    "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> >    or
> >    "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >
> > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> > (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> >
> > If yes to the above, please state either:
> >
> >    "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> >    or
> >    "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >
> > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> >    appropriate.
> >
> > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> > aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> > stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> > contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> > MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> >
> > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> > and
> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Lou (and Pavan)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>