[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Fri, 02 September 2016 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C6112D135; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nLNOiKsyBgNs; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF9412D0F6; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id l94so179544097ual.0; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 07:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UQNG9l9S6Skf5xh+MRAp5E1wqLxP/D0dV6caB2EKMbo=; b=w8JDMIL3XCP8dHfoP9hgY9C4C+rNO0Fm9TdVPZp+ANfIJNWG40OqgFPmIzpx0YVug+ 2RM0NzLcpPzmeg2Vn+r269sfTlvUFSwfL046rNENePMYOdvM9xrBiFxkkJSC+l7vvJaG 45uzBg/MJ1g4wTjosojuxbHkOC1y6m40Ciz2GxSIjEJfPUmBWd0NqbZV6gVnxgs1gevg DE7ZcJKqEtcD7mDLwQo4IPtA1i/LDzGjV2NC/K6I3XsEYTxhmOTFCSC7fpWvPfJn2PfD Ck39WpmqhliNjsrGTO0kBh5J0AEMBJT03CDXAZUQ3FVl30Wjx4ogqoV19XrTGGI5wc7i ykCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UQNG9l9S6Skf5xh+MRAp5E1wqLxP/D0dV6caB2EKMbo=; b=cPFzqsraXwRSHZkzQ7K+6UdGjb5pSyMGqxQFuhrh6ynCiVu/+1NXqSqmfKfQ0lz+F7 7MH1BOna8aDe7DY5Y0kS1h59Tif3NRAh4a3i+sRA158yuCbJe/X3Eiwq6Ot4icCGAL2x McVxPy6z3M7a/0O8iCY9Gr5CcSaaXs1s/bVuK4m6N24yYpopBq30LDGy3v1tG0SCyZHl rkX0AwUMEcNSCe6S0YJd0v3vLDPtYUWJYUFFVL8rO03Q9OtbmYgGQBm5/OzAv8dhNVMD q3HcK/LqcYV8dMM3umla3ihaKau+EzEmMNW8D5iTsJTEPX7MHidxdWPzPKBpgG3gtkvg bVug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNffdL29OmXBgIhYJlNMpTBvp3rwZ+qM7VW1tuyqYJeHExb76u4LmL2wzdXQZYV3m3VXlIt3FCVuHhWFg==
X-Received: by 10.159.40.232 with SMTP id d95mr13420012uad.108.1472826946441; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 07:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.48.131 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 07:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:35:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTuroRa-t67J0pFm2sOwFaYJbOD0_Tm4TVPR82zux32Abg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Zhangxian (Xian)" <zhang.xian@huawei.com>, zhenghaomian@huawei.com, "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, Paweł Brzozowski <PBrzozowski@advaoptical.com>, ggalimbe@cisco.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c122e4af559e1053b873ed4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/VH-FmQvyD6ibqWOFkmRUhOq_Ekk>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:35:49 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.