[Teas] Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09: (with COMMENT)
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 22 August 2024 14:40 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF1DC151981; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 07:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vyzfA_FWhB8H; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 07:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98669C151717; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 07:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 47MEdu8E014079; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:39:56 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E25A4604B; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:39:56 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815F74603D; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:39:56 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:39:56 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-69-109-75.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.109.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 47MEdt69019073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:39:56 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'John Scudder' <jgs@juniper.net>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <172433656634.2517736.10420866036249052284@dt-datatracker-6df4c9dcf5-t2x2k>
In-Reply-To: <172433656634.2517736.10420866036249052284@dt-datatracker-6df4c9dcf5-t2x2k>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:39:56 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <054401daf4a1$28af2590$7a0d70b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHPiO19oi/SC4RYDjS3jyVaYwf/xLJKL6Lg
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 82.69.109.75
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=wONKD8BgYe93k7CyQ03Bx4IKCV5rKfOItY+a/j1TF7A=; b=eAF 6RpfN8ipEVhLHu70hbdB2kTJIjyDj0RJgiJOzehJFrLxaKI0f/wnRjh4SG9PsAk6 vmUFc6uI21EN/cEHFBf9yz/Vk7Fqs3AzutJjmJvJHsbqeKObdMYg4soYIDjlr/9p KGDmF0urFif3T1I9jj7OdBnCmbmklSnJwrCu04/ki9WraHF4d0vYWnogBCWTKSAJ pUkN9+y6XeJrCtbHDWhy3cGSTbeUO2vfu0If8TBho7juDIW/2EBdDP114+zYD+FB RQjPW8wz7xC0Qyp0bQ2nMdtS7LTws7QdrMpwhhbYKFosj0CSe4J1vAEFedfCFKYF 1EXTlMkgGkpQHhmm3zQ==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28352.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.043-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.043-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28352.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.043000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: HXSqh3WYKfvxIbpQ8BhdbMzWN98iBBeGCXED+mgMFBsxN7CM2Nlzz/F1 bqtPiQUis2pATm9V9PxDc4lSgrowpaXgCCul34T6+s0+QZYAcN/GYnoF/CTeZeCbuVI7hVbLkW2 ooQJksHch9+R3v2GivjuIoG1s2/QqkU34HyglnlqOtWfhyZ77Dsf3EaOZ0dNKVUwmVL0cK7OH62 gsspfBEeu5uiqyDy0TWuFWRkcLlsWS6ZREE84qAmQFd4bOnrT6fS0Ip2eEHnxlgn288nW9IDykS kIruodMdB0ntd9Tzp47AFczfjr/7B8Zdyuzq7Se7OivjODKWM55z6VATdggdQG7O4/IixLRU4+J IVmBLOw=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Message-ID-Hash: R363EVQDM7LAEL47PMRBFBPWXLEVG7HM
X-Message-ID-Hash: R363EVQDM7LAEL47PMRBFBPWXLEVG7HM
X-MailFrom: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing@ietf.org, teas-chairs@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, vbeeram@juniper.net
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: [Teas] Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/VL-PE7elZXHAfLvayM2--m527lw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>
Sure. That makes sense. A -----Original Message----- From: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sent: 22 August 2024 15:23 To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing@ietf.org; teas-chairs@ietf.org; teas@ietf.org; vbeeram@juniper.net; vbeeram@juniper.net Subject: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09: (with COMMENT) John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the high-quality document. One minor nit on Section 2.1, Network resources need to be allocated and dedicated for use by a specific network slice service, or they may be shared among multiple slice services. I don't think something "need[s] to be" allocated if it also "may be shared", right? s/need to/can/ seems like it would be right.
- [Teas] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-… John Scudder via Datatracker
- [Teas] Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-i… Adrian Farrel
- [Teas] Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-i… King, Daniel