Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange

"Adrian Farrel" <afarrel@juniper.net> Tue, 26 January 2016 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <afarrel@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EC31A8F49; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 06:07:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FC498ZIdgVEV; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 06:06:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9320B1A8F43; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 06:06:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0QE6tXc007489; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:06:55 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([79.141.128.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0QE6sdU007450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:06:54 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <afarrel@juniper.net>
To: 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>
References: <56A76AFF.4070900@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <56A76AFF.4070900@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:06:54 -0000
Message-ID: <018f01d15842$d029a110$707ce330$@juniper.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQLLhuH4rWPu+CXsdxVTX1DfwW29x50Zdy1w
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22090.004
X-TM-AS-Result: No--22.874-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--22.874-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Alur8Cs15mwmKugBA3f88eDmaeE7z2RkOByiP8mqkZvM1jffIgQXhkdE l9TsJWRaAIZpxx3hp71Vv770Z6fBConoVQ9oIVz7/ex6WTDig5ER9y8WJPyXEBes/RxhysDbgdN Xa4lpKNvz2m/olXhpzV721f1Z1L9K8+sRcjnYJLFzi/Tk7X+jDUMR/ZdMRWYGcFEiuPxHjsX6rV j794QCtl99KTJvos9IG4Kqbbf1wKh53upQHbmOMLz4nfyYESe0jROjughSj+ISF5o+a1M3FdZKs q3DGpalgzauDpOBM9NgIScCiWkKEFkvX5/Fh8kH4m/6in2CA/iRUXjihTf9CJ1U1lojafr/QZXZ g2I8JabnU40jhQv76qPFjJEFr+olfeZdJ1XsorhCITlsmPfzAAtuKBGekqUpPjKoPgsq7cA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/VgC5afijCEj5viC6jeXxsj6mz5s>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 06:40:27 -0800
Cc: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: afarrel@juniper.net
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:07:04 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> Sent: 26 January 2016 12:48
> To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com; jdrake@juniper.net;
> nabil.bitar@verizon.com; swallow@cisco.com; cyril.margaria@googlemail.com;
> diego.caviglia@ericsson.com; ggrammel@juniper.net;
> jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com; kpithewan@infinera.com; ogondio@tid.es;
> rrao@infinera.com; sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com; vbeeram@juniper.net;
> vlopez@tid.es; zali@cisco.com; zhang.xian@huawei.com;
> zhangfatai@huawei.com
> Cc: TEAS WG Chairs; TEAS WG
> Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-
> exchange
> 
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> 
> Thank you,
> TEAS WG Chairs
> 
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas