Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo
tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> Tue, 24 November 2020 12:37 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfa@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85EE3A0A42 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 04:37:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1lTOdaKfCyQd for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 04:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr20098.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.2.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C4443A0A2D for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 04:37:31 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=EuT5L+3bt1UeKnmYPj6uTVSefahCPS1s2Go6btwJlq9lb+VlK0PcQy+Gu1jzu85WxMsTXrHqIC+cZwx54IABfx12e/o60WBYasVgaJACvPRTLABn607Bld3lu/C1/XJDtim5LY/0D0biMsJtvsu3lLE4oNNzr04ww2jS54B1pZG8bREc1SAZJAgfbXCVW8lm9tF3hFDr+BFoD8t2w8KSnnqrTP22azDRHZYBFFnD81WOjHyJP+Ozbu1Nu9X9XWFcqMOSqk3g7TWVzN04lgBK570r29oMrCDrT/nWOlq/sdhoMrwa6262AS7ePeBzm01FUiig3qPCGg8tumMgDig6vA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Y/dIwIcCI4WIcSIjjKoVllotfmGfbUnxGeEk8DgPI5k=; b=FMlW/PXypZuT0X1iF3EF5wRsxDz96EyPrKnZ5hHsLs2p3XWoQIVd7feJOlL2Bqo7EfW4cKn8wWlHE4+82KiKG+/sCPzYibABn9AV2v8f2M+c0UeOyGYVU2IzGExvI1zU6mqkOAclrKgF9tQPvfHpWxwDGRIj9Go0onhOxB579Zqcr3QL6hFmjpanKRpkJ7NEDhVlfmVJlOfylDTEjZpb79EviXZV+XoPRf482hOAQjp73gbtmVs9N8MCq3vt00PcGKMV7x9Wh9u0JDq/5ZuvNxOTxsTXkEETYmDJpuAqg8fvLjWQlqE3hnUxjyPJx6I8rfUbaMwlroacrkpQNIamJQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Y/dIwIcCI4WIcSIjjKoVllotfmGfbUnxGeEk8DgPI5k=; b=b1Lmm/ow5/PKlT9gqJPyBXacEA6UrIiX7Pp36pqY/4PRoupCl8V8bqwb60fNAi25mgpN1CVA4WP6+Thn54gI/2JhVqfQBQ1IYczvfFrnMu81v6WP1HMwO2ZUPecRB8Rk4H2HC46onVfZKJgRW3EMK7S6OHE8TJNDdnoFl1qo9iA=
Received: from AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:95::29) by AM6PR07MB4085.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:209:32::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3611.9; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:37:28 +0000
Received: from AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::15d0:d260:35ea:7c9b]) by AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::15d0:d260:35ea:7c9b%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3611.020; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:37:28 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
To: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo
Thread-Index: AQHWuVlOUlO9eF9UlkypHx74kSbNTqnXRbt9
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:37:28 +0000
Message-ID: <AM6PR07MB5784CE62D84CBAF454870097A2FB0@AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAEz6PPTKK-MFUyUAKBW1+2sBry2=ov9TXHCF8mL6hZ_1fXCo+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEz6PPTKK-MFUyUAKBW1+2sBry2=ov9TXHCF8mL6hZ_1fXCo+g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [86.146.121.140]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 31ca061d-1f75-4d45-764d-08d89075b46b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM6PR07MB4085:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM6PR07MB4085A9EED2BB9F6473FE0127A2FB0@AM6PR07MB4085.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: FF5zrxfrw3XF0t2zLulwAdVoaTzBpiFqSmLxkbPPUM/aqC00r3ic69ykagTPoQWcpBG8ux6Un0cUHSfbSg5CAeabiNjvq83zoh5Rw42J8dBFLJlgJOizOrPkViLjUNZOJ5OD23W6fNBeq0Y26TryxheO8XSyQViuj32ke1xn5x5nhCV1L/ZnzoePhpRJbhKWFd11CI2NcnwxjGk7aOwW0SpPWIZlvDzUKCImUrzidP1R9A+m3wJKYMS6M1dK+cSwhBw43lronxqAkXVZvnGZtvVJ7uYiDnBFLuIx9dc324+yS/F93iOPn/78rp013A2d
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(8676002)(8936002)(83380400001)(52536014)(186003)(71200400001)(5660300002)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(316002)(76116006)(91956017)(86362001)(26005)(6506007)(110136005)(7696005)(478600001)(2906002)(33656002)(15650500001)(55016002)(9686003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM6PR07MB5784.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 31ca061d-1f75-4d45-764d-08d89075b46b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Nov 2020 12:37:28.4010 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: QVT6bywwNmEVfayNKNF5ke0WVedVhbRtKR0ukMxWIsPXowmO7GhfAj/TFyFGzShuZNq4OxlzCrlkWZhSqraLVA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6PR07MB4085
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/LswvUsRj2IKokOEMfivHQ6qtJgo>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 12:37:34 -0000
From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Sent: 13 November 2020 01:06 Current Status: * Received further valuable comments from Tom Petch. * Plan to post an updated version next week to address some review comments from Tom. <tp> Thanks for that; clearer but I will take a while to get my mind around it. On prefix, I think that l3tet is absolutely right (there are those who think that anything remotely te should be texyz - not me) I would take it one stage further and use l3-tet for topology type since it is a l3 te topology! The references to te-topo and te-types need updating to the RFC - I do not know if there are technical changes, those I-D did so many somersaults that I lost track. Your e-mail addresses in this I-D do match! Since the IETF has abolished pagination, a bugbear of mine, then it behoves us to try and keep sections short. I wonder if s.4.2 would be better split so that each augment is a separate section with perhaps a line or two of text saying e.g. This augments the te link attributes with statistics and configuration when the network type is packet I do not think that that subtracts from legibility and does ease references thereto Appendix B is more of a challenge to divide into sections! Tom Petch Open Issues: * Authors working on addressing Tom’s comments. Next Steps: * Follow-up with Tom and resolve comments. * Welcome further reviews and suggestions. * Keep coordinating with ietf-eth-te-topology and ietf-te-mpls-tp-topo to ensure aligned model relations. * Working Group Last Call after completing the above. Thanks, - Xufeng