[Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo

Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 24 July 2021 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007A73A2265 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T-TEw_1nZ1-D for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0D203A2267 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id hb6so6003537ejc.8 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6pGywvcrejJw8Xz5fCXTUJnFMBh+Uk9w9enEYbsipIc=; b=oXdkQGTSiWRnv1L0i3Jr/6kdE46n0WmTQ56DTq4JJKYQQuDDBrl1ISCA3zasbwjRTR wm4owl5FUna6wlvENceY2SUnNbYzbw1c+W8vwnYNLACgD7KGAqkbW+HX86Dx5tjnPH0e dDRWM0g9C7AxhY1pSZGo4zyjNyhzhWQzu8tRoLlm/ugpNhqXN9cilC/wblpBKN2M7pJh gDgLP4WMru1DpMWpp0CY7nRqrHy8Mde0fleZO36drvmHdSPaOgpopMzxD3ZaHwpYTS0H MGYBs9eQrOx/c8DpmHr0qpAJIal+uXz5jsE8EyxQIArY2XAzG1MOYDssVM6GJZU03HZ3 2foA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6pGywvcrejJw8Xz5fCXTUJnFMBh+Uk9w9enEYbsipIc=; b=HJGPxn4TeUiCWrbDSLe5+NWGI/klu3mCG2bXgHsnOIYd/AhKMd14GZVZkCPwsNiLuj 3pRaUHLGOeyd6YdqNJjegurHc6kiJsuss0KojwcreKhQEYZf7ApbMAQ3dfzGDo9tZZ2F YHn5nQvWEdWAQ8KXqXvj8yL9XqLNr9V+FpmsMnPQCh3H0x/Dg+LfyS4KVReiHJRb69jj Pu9hF7gGErIzdsNJyRBEcSdW1jUsPdRQay+pMRbEPuSE+C4TokS6h1UqOAJbGETESM1q MkIMgQt2nspHQLW+vpnDYHDSqPWpFdw5sjTmZ+oThU8xkLPc+2Pz9oOsaZYQYN+w98rX vPIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315K14fHH5Lgv9a86DxtzFEtLkYsPy8aNQGOGG83QJOVg4EqFa2 3VGt3eiuPlXXVTg5WiFbERibBcPBqCqMc0IF6ozfJlxhI3o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUjrjUzY9SFBAT+DrTMk0mM/rKCk7IcRui/xwkC/SiicywyAfxc1TWcsdtQ13hEN6yc2k1c9jUuE4OptaVQGk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4a8d:: with SMTP id x13mr6920094eju.349.1627084931086; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:01:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEz6PPTDfhB6vQdk5YKWtoHRh0eyM5TeuWXhtUPWVasr4D5pCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000563c7205c7d33be6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/W-XLO6DTm6q7CIVU_OmGSBCfHH0>
Subject: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 00:02:22 -0000

Current Status:

  *  The discussions on MPLS-TE Topology resulted in change requests
     on this model
     + An update on ietf-te-packet-types.yang (published in RFC8776) is
needed;
     + ietf-te-topology-packet.yang needs augmentations for packet-specific
       TE bandwidth.
  *  Posted updated version -11, to address the two issues above.

Open Issues:

  *  The newly introduced ietf-te-packet-types.yang needs to be
     further reviewed and completed.
  *  The newly updated TE bandwidth in ietf-te-topology-packet.yang
     needs to be further reviewed and completed.
  *  Align with the WG consensus on the module prefix convention.

Next Steps:

  *  Welcome further reviews and suggestions.
  *  Keep coordinating with ietf-eth-te-topology and ietf-te-mpls-topology
     to ensure aligned model relations.
  *  Working Group Last Call after completing the above.

Thanks,
- Xufeng