Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08
"Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com> Thu, 24 February 2022 04:04 UTC
Return-Path: <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056B03A13AE for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 20:04:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9PD8lZG_C2o5 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 20:04:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC2403A13AF for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 20:04:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml743-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4K3zh12xmqz67wTp; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:00:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.98) by fraeml743-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 05:04:50 +0100
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.98) by dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.21; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:04:48 +0800
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.76]) by dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.76]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.021; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:04:48 +0800
From: "Wubo (lana)" <lana.wubo@huawei.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
CC: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08
Thread-Index: AdgpLWRc9a8pR4OERUqonbNenE2Q+Q==
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 04:04:48 +0000
Message-ID: <f658e053a826479bbb51fcf3a0d38ae5@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.98.73]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/WX9NwvmrzST_DvXOjDZAJFarl1Y>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 04:04:59 -0000
Hi Joel, Thank you for your reply. In my opinion, what you're saying is different from the reply of Pavan about aggregating multiple NS services. Your view is: NS (n:1) -> slice flow aggregate (SFA) (n:1) -->NRP Section 5.3 (from Pavan): NS -> VPN-> SFA -->NRP My understanding, and Med also pointed out: NS (n:1) -> VPN (n:1) -> TE-topology/TE-tunnel/SR-policy/NRP etc. And the document also says: The mechanisms used by the controller to determine the mapping of one or more IETF network slice to a Slice-Flow Aggregate are outside the scope of this document. Therefore, slice flow aggregate does not appear to be a necessary for NS realization. As the draft is intended as a general solution document, I think the SFA is not needed, and it could cause some misunderstanding. Thanks, Bo > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com] > 发送时间: 2022年2月24日 10:10 > 收件人: Wubo (lana) <lana.wubo@huawei.com>; Vishnu Pavan Beeram > <vishnupavan@gmail.com> > 抄送: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org> > 主题: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08 > > I am not understanding your concern Wubo. Apologies. > Please allow me to explain where it seems I am missing, and maybe you can > clarify. > > We refer to the construct in teh draft as a slice flow aggregate so as to > emphasis and remind all readers that this component can carry multiple > external slices. > > Having said that, as a deployment option, it is always possible for an operator > to use one slice flow aggregate for each external network slice (of whatever > kind). While I am concerned about the scaling of such an approach, it is > clearly permitted and supported by the approach describe in the draft. > > Yours, > Joel > > On 2/23/2022 9:02 PM, Wubo (lana) wrote: > > Hi Pavan, > > > > Thanks for your reply. Please see inline for my further comments. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bo > > > > *发件人:*Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com] > > *发送时间:*2022年2月23日22:29 > > *收件人:*Wubo (lana) <lana.wubo@huawei.com> > > *抄送:*Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>; TEAS > WG > > Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet@ietf.org > > *主题:*Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08 > > > > Bo, > > > > Please see inline for responses (prefixed VPB).. > > > > Regards, > > > > -Pavan (on behalf of the authors) > > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 6:39 AM Wubo (lana) > > <lana.wubo=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org > > <mailto:40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have read the draft and have some questions with the text and terms. > > > > 1. This document seems only define SFA (slice-flow aggregation) > > based mapping solution, that is, slice services mapping to SFAs, and > > SFAs to NRP(Network Resource Partition)s. > > If this draft is supposed to be a generic slicing realization > > document, I think, it should allow more options. For example, the > > slice services could be mapped to VPNs, and > > VPNs mapped to underlying resources with method described in > > draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang. > > > > [VPB] Please refer to section 5.3 > > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08 > > #section-5.3 > > > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-best > bar-teas-ns-packet-08*section-5.3__;Iw!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RKgzM9K5I6Crs9-9Ok > xWcIvs0atMYM1O1zZWrRa009HkrnmqRqcVdrJg4EU6Aib-$>). > > It does note that the usual techniques for steering service traffic > > onto paths are applicable -- the example that you cite is certainly > > allowed. We can add a reference to > > draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang in this section and make it > > explicit. > > > > */[Bo Wu] Thanks for the clarification, but my concerns are not just > > about Section 5.3. Taking Section 3.3 as an example, Slice-Flow > > Aggregation Mapping, there are also multiple sections titled with SFA. > > I hope that the name can be changed to "slice service mapping” or > > “slice service flow mapping" and the options described in section 5.3 > > can also be reflected in those sections. Otherwise, as Med suggested, > > maybe the draft name could be changed to “Realizing Network Slices in > > IP/MPLS Networks supporting SFA”./* > > > > > > 2. This draft refers to draft-bestbar-teas-yang-slice-policy, but > > the following definition are not consistent: > > 1) SFA is not defined in draft-bestbar-teas-yang-slice-policy, but > > is seems relevant from the definition. And I can't find NRP Policy > > selection Criteria in the model definition. > > Slice-Flow Aggregate: a collection of packets that match an NRP > > Policy selection criteria and are given the same forwarding > > treatment ; > > > > 2) draft-bestbar-teas-yang-slice-policy defines Slice Selector, but > > apart from Slice Selector, this draft also defines FAS and FASL. It > > is recommended that the terms be consistent. > > FAS: Flow Aggregate Selector; FASL: Flow Aggregate Selector Label. > > > > [VPB] The last two comments above are for the NRP policy data model > > draft (Thanks for bringing it up!). We agree that the NRP policy data > > model draft needs to be updated to be in sync with the current > > terminology used in draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet. This should get done > > in the next few days. But please note that the NRP policy data model > > draft is not the one that is currently being polled for adoption. > > > > */[Bo Wu] I'm sorry my question is not clear. Let me rephrase it. As > > described in the document, the SFA is maintained by the controller, > > which means that the data plane within the device is not SFA aware. > > Then could you explain the reason of defining FAS and FASL? And what > > are the differences between them and Network Resource Partition Data > > Plane Selector? /* > > > > > > Thanks, > > Bo > > > -----邮件原件----- > > > 发件人: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org > > <mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org>] 代表Lou Berger > > > 发送时间: 2022年2月18日21:28 > > > 收件人: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org>> > > > 抄送: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org > > <mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>; > > > draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet@ietf.org > > <mailto:draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet@ietf.org> > > > 主题: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet-08 > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet/ > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bestbar-teas-ns-packet/> > > > > > > Please note that IPR has been disclosed on this document: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-bestbar-teas-n > > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-bestbar-teas- > n> > > > s-packet > > > > > > Please voice your support or objections to adoption on the list by the > end of the > > > day (any time zone) March 4. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Lou (as Co-chair) > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Teas mailing list > > > Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas> > > _______________________________________________ > > Teas mailing list > > Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Teas mailing list > > Teas@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
- [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-ns-pa… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Chandrasekar Ramachandran
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Srihari Sangli
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Colby Barth
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… peng.shaofu
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Wen, Bin
- Re: [Teas] [E] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-te… Jalil, Luay
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… chen.ran
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… chen.ran
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] [**EXTERNAL**] Re: WG adoption poll: d… Rokui, Reza
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Raveendra Torvi
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Wubo (lana)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Wubo (lana)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Wubo (lana)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Ogaki, Kenichi
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Ogaki, Kenichi
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Wubo (lana)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Huzhibo
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Wubo (lana)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Abhishek Deshmukh
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- [Teas] Fwd: WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Wubo (lana)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Wubo (lana)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-bestbar-teas-n… Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)