[Teas] Fwd: [i2rs] WG LC for Topology (10/1 to 10/14)
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 08 October 2015 18:01 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2291B2CFA for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ejiA8R3y6JtW for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 30DC81B2D05 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10395 invoked by uid 0); 8 Oct 2015 18:01:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2015 18:01:55 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id Si1s1r00Y2SSUrH01i1v5C; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:01:55 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=IekUBwaa c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=5lJygRwiOn0A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=1sjgXBK7AAAA:8 a=Tg0nUI2_AAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=6VwMkFwgTg1LYy-i_3oA:9 a=T9c2dmSjOXd-4-AH:21 a=WYm8nqo_Fq8JS1ne:21 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:To:References:Subject; bh=8t9pFMOxdFYLn/wTzzYL2AHZCPEPVyZMmWexE0cYuQ0=; b=btkWPkwbu90zbdevrZAkZ2pFhqSEYTh1CyPbzg2LUY/I1AOTDjAKkfW3C8Gd20M3m8Vcc7HLJDYbvYDdSP//mnxx6NS+mjiJ4S8urWUXhXq0f1v5rhwxzE0IXdB8/gQo;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:39069 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ZkFVo-0001XB-Ga; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:01:52 -0600
References: <007701d0fc9a$537bcd90$fa7368b0$@ndzh.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <007701d0fc9a$537bcd90$fa7368b0$@ndzh.com>
Message-ID: <5616AF8B.6060907@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 14:01:47 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <007701d0fc9a$537bcd90$fa7368b0$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/X1uv3BFFJbjMD0dhBEXQraTi3JM>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo@ietf.org
Subject: [Teas] Fwd: [i2rs] WG LC for Topology (10/1 to 10/14)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:01:58 -0000
WG, Authors,
Note that the base I2RS topology models are in LC in I2RS. I know
that there's been some discussion on expected / desired changes to those
models to support TE Topology. Now is the time to make your
comments/desired changes known.
Please send comments i2rs@ietf.org. cc this list (teas) if you think
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo will be directly impacted.
Thank you!
Lou
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [i2rs] WG LC for Topology (10/1 to 10/14)
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 18:41:34 -0400
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: i2rs@ietf.org
CC: 'Jeffrey Haas' <jhaas@pfrc.org>, 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>
This begins a 2 week WG Last call (10/1 to 10/14)
draft-ietf-yang-network-topo – modeling draft
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology – L3 topology
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-topology – L2 topology
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology/
Implementation status:
This an OpenDaylight (ODL) implementation of the L3 topology and general
model. It is likely the L2 topology model will be supported in future
ODL implementations. Jeff and I would appreciate anyone who has
implementations of these topology models to provide details on list or
offlist to the chairs.
Sue Hares
- [Teas] Fwd: [i2rs] WG LC for Topology (10/1 to 10… Lou Berger
- Re: [Teas] [i2rs] WG LC for Topology (10/1 to 10/… Zhangxian (Xian)
- Re: [Teas] [i2rs] WG LC for Topology (10/1 to 10/… Xufeng Liu