[Teas] LLDP snooping references for ACTN POI
Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Thu, 16 September 2021 09:28 UTC
Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE203A21C5 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 02:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XmXHtDlPi9zM for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 02:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B33B3A21C4 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 02:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4H9BXN2xVcz6873Q for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:25:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 11:28:23 +0200
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.34]) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.34]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.008; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 11:28:23 +0200
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: LLDP snooping references for ACTN POI
Thread-Index: Adeq3FUF4VsGayg6T6KgCNe/1k/Jww==
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:28:23 +0000
Message-ID: <254416234d704ad8bc0c3dc04abfad8e@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.86.236]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_254416234d704ad8bc0c3dc04abfad8ehuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/XAQrQdtoOLvzol13VmKmWNimo-w>
Subject: [Teas] LLDP snooping references for ACTN POI
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:28:29 -0000
Dear TEAS WG, In draft-ietf-teas-actn-poi-applicability, LLDP snooping is mentioned as the preferred method to discover the adjacency between an IP router port and an ROAD edge port The issue we are facing is that LLDP snooping is not described in any standard document but only in vendors' documentations so we are not sure which informative reference we should provide in the draft for LLDP snooping For more information see: https://github.com/FabioPeruzzini/actn-poi/issues/39 Do you know if a similar issue been faced before and, if so, how it has been addressed? Would be ok to add informative references to vendors' documentation? Thanks, Italo (on behalf of co-authors and contributors)
- [Teas] LLDP snooping references for ACTN POI Italo Busi
- Re: [Teas] LLDP snooping references for ACTN POI Scharf, Michael
- Re: [Teas] LLDP snooping references for ACTN POI Adrian Farrel