Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path
John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Mon, 11 May 2015 12:42 UTC
Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57AF1A1F00 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 05:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8zNcFvYV62kt for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 05:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0101.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2578C1A1C00 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 05:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.141) by BLUPR05MB564.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.154.19; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:42:19 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) by BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) with mapi id 15.01.0160.009; Mon, 11 May 2015 12:42:19 +0000
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path
Thread-Index: AQHQiovDVS3BD+WnIk60i0KcoHO9uZ113YKAgADdKyA=
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:42:18 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR05MB562DCFD6A7B237A2AA58C64C7DB0@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvftt+FkZDqMM-65t87kVhQDzS38+4OoOe2v--fHvntqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rcEo0WgFXiydz291HsDnuL_m6dRrvheNRhbgXXrOmZwjw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rcEo0WgFXiydz291HsDnuL_m6dRrvheNRhbgXXrOmZwjw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.18]
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB564;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB564E3818C137E7B1C3A2C26C7DB0@BLUPR05MB564.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR05MB564; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB564;
x-forefront-prvs: 05739BA1B5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(377454003)(24454002)(46102003)(66066001)(99286002)(5001960100002)(16236675004)(76576001)(15975445007)(102836002)(33656002)(230783001)(2950100001)(2900100001)(5001770100001)(74316001)(86362001)(92566002)(189998001)(106116001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(76176999)(54356999)(50986999)(19609705001)(19617315012)(77156002)(62966003)(87936001)(122556002)(40100003)(19625215002)(2656002)(19300405004)(77096005)(7059030); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB564; H:BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BLUPR05MB562DCFD6A7B237A2AA58C64C7DB0BLUPR05MB562namprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 May 2015 12:42:18.1965 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB564
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/YQ05QqQ65aL9Tdk8KKnH_OHRQfg>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 11 May 2015 05:55:19 -0700
Cc: Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "spencer.giacalone@thomsonreuters.com" <spencer.giacalone@thomsonreuters.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, David Ward <dward@cisco.com>, Stefano Previdi <sprevidi@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:42:28 -0000
Nor am I Yours Irrespectively, John From: Alia Atlas [mailto:akatlas@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 7:30 PM To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram Cc: John E Drake; spencer.giacalone@thomsonreuters.com; David Ward; Stefano Previdi; Clarence Filsfils; teas@ietf.org Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Alia On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> wrote: Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG), As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, TEAS WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
- [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-expres… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-ex… Alia Atlas
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-ex… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-ex… Clarence Filsfils
- Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-ex… John E Drake
- [Teas] Fwd: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-e… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-expres… Spencer Giacalone