Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-05

Khasanov Boris <khasanov.boris@huawei.com> Thu, 14 May 2020 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <khasanov.boris@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41C83A0BA8 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rS6GyEm7BQy for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EE9D3A0B73 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml716-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 8D2ACA6266932103E68E; Thu, 14 May 2020 20:21:07 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml717-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.68) by lhreml716-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 14 May 2020 20:21:07 +0100
Received: from lhreml717-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.201.108.68]) by lhreml717-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.201.108.68]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Thu, 14 May 2020 20:21:07 +0100
From: Khasanov Boris <khasanov.boris@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn" <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>, Quintin zhao <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>, "huaimo.chen@futurewei.com" <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com>
CC: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-05
Thread-Index: AQHWKUDICZAffJJn8EeLqT3HV4FPqain9sXA
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 19:21:07 +0000
Message-ID: <625446582a4c44849649384cfa29156e@huawei.com>
References: <327046fe-1026-f483-57ce-bef658f28a77@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <327046fe-1026-f483-57ce-bef658f28a77@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.187.171]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/YaU7bZiH8YYzejWUF0RAY6OQSpM>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-05
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 19:21:14 -0000

Hi Lou and all,

No, I am not aware about any IRP that applies to this draft.

SY,
Boris

-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 7:08 PM
To: wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn; Quintin zhao <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>; Khasanov Boris <khasanov.boris@huawei.com>; huaimo.chen@futurewei.com
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-05

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.