Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity

["Ori Gerstel" <[e-mail]>]

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.
Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.
The applicable IPR is https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1943/

BR
Ori

-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 2:11 PM
To: Ori Gerstel <[e-mail]>; 'Zafar Ali (zali)' <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 'Clarence Filsfils
(cfilsfil)' <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; 'Gabriele Maria
Galimberti (ggalimbe)' <[e-mail]>; 'Matt Hartley (mhartley)'
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
'George Swallow -X (swallow - CLEARPATH WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT INC at Cisco)'
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; 'TEAS WG' <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity

Ori:

Since you answered yes, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

Lou


On 6/6/2016 1:06 AM, Ori Gerstel wrote:
> Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zafar Ali (zali) [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 11:43 PM
> To: Lou Berger <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) <[e-mail]>; 
> [e-mail]; Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe) 
> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Matt Hartley (mhartley) 
> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; George Swallow -X 
> (swallow - CLEARPATH WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT INC at Cisco) 
> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; TEAS WG <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity
>
> Hi Lou and the WG: 
>
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft². "Yes, the IPR has 
> been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules². The applicable IPR 
> is https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1943/.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards Š Zafar
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6/5/16, 1:52 PM, "Lou Berger" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>>
>> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>>
>> Please state either:
>>
>> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> or
>> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>>
>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>>
>> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> or
>> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think 
>> appropriate.
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer 
>> the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not 
>> you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to 
>> the next stage until a response has been received from each author 
>> and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN 
>> THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>>
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not 
>> listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations 
>> under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if 
>> you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain 
>> from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your 
>> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed 
>> above and 
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> TEAS WG Chairs
>>
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your 
>> response.
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas