IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Sun, 05 June 2016 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F32912D1D1 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QWNl1gIv8RPY for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DD4D12D0DB for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2015; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1465159374; x=1466368974; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ITX9ciuA14dmyNYWrZa3y+W/IsVB47FP+E4C7daEkzA=; b=D8GnbaBT4pnHnmKkR77l5uHq56kaGaisoNAiB4wl+OXGq+QVSq4Ozeqb we+LTnQQ85kKkUGP4sjYADMuDZ1w/7VFYOBUItQf9WxoPSy5XoZA7kIIZ auBdaK5RKh1OzeqOc1vb1Zyn6Qc+JLtuaoY0pd0BIJZd2sXjihm9zHroX s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D4AQCCjVRX/49dJa1cgzpWfQa6XIF6IoVwAoEcOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeERgEBBHQVAgEIDjgyJQIEARKILw65KQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR+GJ4RNhBIRARyFWgWYSAGGAogjgWlOhAKIZY9ZAR42g25uAYh8Nn8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,423,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="110062310"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jun 2016 20:42:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (xch-rtp-001.cisco.com [64.101.220.141]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u55Kgr8s022632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 5 Jun 2016 20:42:53 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 16:42:52 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 16:42:52 -0400
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "ibryskin@advaoptical.com" <ibryskin@advaoptical.com>, "Daniele.Ceccarelli@ericsson.com" <Daniele.Ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "dhruv.ietf@gmail.com" <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "ogondio@tid.es" <ogondio@tid.es>, "don.fedyk@hp.com" <don.fedyk@hp.com>, "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "fu.xihua@zte.com.cn" <fu.xihua@zte.com.cn>, "Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)" <ggalimbe@cisco.com>, "origerstel@gmail.com" <origerstel@gmail.com>, "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>, "ke-kumaki@kddi.com" <ke-kumaki@kddi.com>, "Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de" <Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de>, "Lieven.Levrau@nokia.com" <Lieven.Levrau@nokia.com>, "cyril.margaria@gmail.com" <cyril.margaria@gmail.com>, "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "tochio@jp.fujitsu.com" <tochio@jp.fujitsu.com>, "zhang.xian@huawei.com" <zhang.xian@huawei.com>, "Dieter.Beller@nokia.com" <Dieter.Beller@nokia.com>, "George Swallow -X (swallow - CLEARPATH WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT INC at Cisco)" <swallow@cisco.com>, "zhangfatai@huawei.com" <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity
Thread-Index: AQHRv1MVaGVyS1NMpEWG3aoYiyr6+J/bVwGA
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 20:42:52 +0000
Message-ID: <D37A0560.17B019%zali@cisco.com>
References: <d0a381b8-45b4-8440-b18d-060d43fb3d44@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <d0a381b8-45b4-8440-b18d-060d43fb3d44@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <2CBD9E456BAD904BB1E178290EA46125@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Yr7aQcTlkIJM52bhBzu0EJsUOOc>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-lsp-diversity
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 20:42:56 -0000

Hi Lou and the WG: 

"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft². "Yes, the IPR has been
disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules². The applicable IPR is
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1943/.


Thanks

Regards Š Zafar





On 6/5/16, 1:52 PM, "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

>
>Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
>As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
>
>Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
>Please state either:
>
>"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>or
>"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
>If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>or
>"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>appropriate.
>
>If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
>TO LINES.
>
>If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>and
>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
>Thank you,
>TEAS WG Chairs
>
>PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
>response.
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email