[Teas] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 06 March 2019 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D521311EE for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 13:21:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7tarFkj8SG5F for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 13:21:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alt-proxy16.mail.unifiedlayer.com (alt-proxy16.mail.unifiedlayer.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3EC131257 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 13:21:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmgw10.unifiedlayer.com (unknown []) by gproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EBC1E077C for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:21:07 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 1dyNhU4iEuj2o1dyNhVubu; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:21:07 -0700
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: $(_cmae_reason
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:To: References:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=sXoG6eMLjVoJvAFmKbJA4HSLhdm+XfQ9lTEHZ0jMhE4=; b=i6+I9WaKSB50O1sERw1Y9PkfaK qjTv9LM9+UVCNDDQLTfOebRkYnh+6JNyDVrm2qPUf0hZFJfgypBGY4k1dkcBTWBcKu9Qnet+1OjR1 jb1YM+MtPSjP5DHLx8jHTjHFO;
Received: from pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([]:58828 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1h1dyN-002GZx-F8; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:21:07 -0700
References: <155189817187.307.659471814489604970.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo@ietf.org>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <155189817187.307.659471814489604970.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <6800dd59-ee76-9985-ec6c-060d9ee9d498@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 16:21:06 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <155189817187.307.659471814489604970.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------EA1E2B173BB0DC0357B8805F"
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1h1dyN-002GZx-F8
X-Source-Sender: pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) []:58828
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/YrnmGQGLMhozCa4AHm1NNTdwqVY>
Subject: [Teas] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 21:21:14 -0000


     The recent versions of the te-topology doc had sufficiently 
significant technical changes that our AD and I, with input from the 
authors, agreed that the document should come back to the WG and to 
rerun a full last call process.  The key changes in rev -19 were:

- Referencing the te-types document and updates to point to its module

- introduction of information-source-instance

The second change is a technical change resulting from implementation 
experience, so is a good change, but as it is a substantive technical 
change the document has to come out of the RFC editor queue to accept it.

     Can you send out a message summarizing all changes.

We will then restart the WG LC process.

Thank you,
Lou (as Shepherd/co-chair)

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo
Date: 	Wed, 06 Mar 2019 10:49:31 -0800
From: 	IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
To: 	lberger@labn.net, teas-chairs@ietf.org, 

The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo has been changed to "WG
Document" from "Submitted to IESG for Publication" by Deborah Brungard: