[Teas] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-03: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 10 May 2018 02:39 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, teas-chairs@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, teas@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152591998836.10259.5956923609434910028.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 19:39:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/YuZ0k9lOqmUnh8yGSZ3sdanPp-4>
Subject: [Teas] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-03: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Most of my comments have already been made by others. I have only a couple of
minor comments remaining:

§1:
-It seems kind of weird to mix "requirements" and "assumptions" in the same
list. - Item 4: The "MAY" seems like a statement of fact, not permission.

[Teas] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
Re: [Teas] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… Harish Sitaraman