[Teas] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-06: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One question: I think I don't understand how the proposed framework would
interact with non-Time-Scheduled reservations or reservations that support TS
but don't know their end-time. If you have such reservations, you basically
already need to block the resources of all future scheduled reservations
because you don't know how long the requested unbounded reservation is needed,
which could also lead to an non-optimal resource  scheduling. Could you please
clarify this in the document or further elaborate/acknowledge this problem in
the doc?