Re: [Teas] Poll on making draft-liu-teas-yang-te-topo-01 a WG document

Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 22 April 2015 09:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dieter.beller@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90FC1B3378 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 02:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.186
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPVKRmJJzxtZ for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 02:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D2641A1AC1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 02:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id C1C167321149; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:33:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t3M9X1Mx020126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:33:04 +0200
Received: from [149.204.107.61] (135.239.27.39) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:33:03 +0200
Message-ID: <55376ACE.4080402@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:33:02 +0200
From: Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, 'Daniele Ceccarelli' <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>, 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
References: <552C0611.70500@labn.net> <55315820.70304@alcatel-lucent.com> <002b01d07b2d$7e45c1f0$7ad145d0$@ndzh.com> <553648A8.5070800@alcatel-lucent.com> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48128EA137@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <00ce01d07ca1$fd9eb540$f8dc1fc0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00ce01d07ca1$fd9eb540$f8dc1fc0$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [135.239.27.39]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/_2Av9nlFr3t_QVpDw1TabZ4mqiM>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Poll on making draft-liu-teas-yang-te-topo-01 a WG document
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:33:10 -0000

+1 that we should consider both


Thanks,
Dieter


On 22.04.2015 04:13, Susan Hares wrote:

Daniele:

 

You are correct.  Dieter has given the hierarchy.    The wide topologies is the split of the bigger topology into smaller domains (in layer 3 VPNs). 

 

I also think we should consider both.

 

Sue

 

 

From: Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 9:39 AM
To: Dieter Beller; Susan Hares; 'Lou Berger'; 'TEAS WG'
Subject: RE: [Teas] Poll on making draft-liu-teas-yang-te-topo-01 a WG document

 

Agree Dieter, and I think this maps to “hierarchy” in Susan’ commets.

 

Actually, if my understanding of “wide topology” is correct (I guess it refers to the split of a big topology in smaller “domains”) I think that we should consider both.

 

BR
Daniele

 

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dieter Beller
Sent: martedì 21 aprile 2015 14:55
To: Susan Hares; 'Lou Berger'; 'TEAS WG'
Subject: Re: [Teas] Poll on making draft-liu-teas-yang-te-topo-01 a WG document

 

Hi Sue, all,


On 20.04.2015 07:47, Susan Hares wrote:

Dieter:

 

Do you think the arbitrary number of TE topologies are arbitrary in a hierarchy (1-N levels) or a wide topologies (1-N topologies).

I am having some difficulties to really understand your question. Let me try to clarify what I meant with my comment:

An abstract topology is according to my understanding composed of links and vertices (nodes) and a vertex could be an abstract
node that represents an underlying abstract topology. This underlying abstract topology can be decomposed again into links and
vertices (nodes) when you zoom into an abstract node.

Based on this principle of recursion, you can create a hierarchy that can have arbitrary levels and a further decomposition is possible
until you have not reached the physical node level (bottom of the hierarchy).

I hope this helps.


Thanks,
Dieter
 


 

Sue

 

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dieter Beller
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 3:00 PM
To: Lou Berger; TEAS WG
Subject: Re: [Teas] Poll on making draft-liu-teas-yang-te-topo-01 a WG document

 

Hi Lou, all,

yes/support - however, other than +1 to comments from Paul, Young, and Xian, I would like to emphasize again what I commented
during the discussion in Dallas:

An introduction and a description of the information model (similar to that in draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-00) is needed in the
beginning of the document that explains the YANG data model. This section would describe the relationships of the managed entities
(objects) and their attributes with references to the YANG model tree structure and the model definition.

Moreover, for example in the context of ACTN, the model also needs to describe how it can support an arbitrary number of TE
topology hierarchies
.  I have seen that the current model already provides some means for that, but this should be described in
more detail and some examples should be provided.


Thanks,
Dieter



On 13.04.2015 20:08, Lou Berger wrote:

All,
 
This is start of a two week poll on making
draft-liu-teas-yang-te-topo-01 a TEAS working group document. Please
send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”.
If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the
document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like
to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
 
This document is the product of the TE Topology YANG Model Design Team
and the intent is for this work to serve as the foundation for the WG's
normal activities in this area, i.e., the document is the starting point
for the WG -- not a finished product.  The DT will be closed once we
have a WG document on this topic.
 
The poll ends Monday April 27th
Thanks,
Lou (and Pavan, who is a co-author)
 
_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas





_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas