IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr-06: (with COMMENT)

"Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com> Fri, 26 October 2018 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6CD1298C5; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.971
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.971 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-DD4CIfuLNB; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEA4D130DF6; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1860; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540568317; x=1541777917; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=CcmsZ1uvmOlkc/cKPppdJaxotWBjP+Zg6gqVgo2L3oI=; b=PodAGp4e2L0Ymue3XtzhfxjOVX/C5b9Ao+xu77ZZgJQSXK9GKD+5gqk4 PT7daCuG9bVEUaOUBHS67tIfma3kPj9iWzbn0UQJPbALt+MKdk6l7uIcC DB8CvWw466Y7j66uO93pq7FMJbBnSe/HcyGNl344PHPkSrcgu2C9rorZ/ 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AEAACeM9Nb/4MNJK1jGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGCBGZ/KAqDa4gYjBiZKhSBZgsBASWERwIXgwEhNA0NAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFOwYjEUUQAgEIGgImAgICMBUQAgQBDQWDIQGCAQ+mL4EuhD5AhRkFgQuKXReBQT+BOB+CTIMbAgECAYEqARIBHxeCbTGCJgKIeItuiUpPCQKGZ4MfhncYgVKEd4l8jG2JfgIRFIEmHThkWBEIcBVlAYJBgk+ISoU+bwGLBYEfgR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,428,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="191458660"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2018 15:38:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (xch-rcd-017.cisco.com [173.37.102.27]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9QFcaGv016797 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:38:36 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:38:35 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com ([173.36.7.28]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 10:38:35 -0500
From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr@ietf.org>, Vishnu Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUa92OWAwxHn5zAEWa3g0oBiqRh6UxvPEA
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:38:35 +0000
Message-ID: <08031A25-AD71-436C-A72C-92DFF4B9E249@cisco.com>
References: <154041523082.6939.10153957213520601144.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154041523082.6939.10153957213520601144.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1d.0.161209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.249.236]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <6A8F0240B0C78B48B3B56EE98AE432D1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.27, xch-rcd-017.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/_mn9_Ki3_e2ssWoV3mV3FrpO3NA>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:38:39 -0000

Hi Ben,

Thank you for your review/comment.

Agree, we will re-order the first and second sections in the next revision.

Thanks,
Rakesh


On 2018-10-24, 5:07 PM, "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

    Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr-06: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Thanks for the work on this!
    
    I just have one strictly editorial comment:
    
    I found it odd that the introduction doesn't occur until section 2.  I think
    section 1 would make more sense if I had had the context from the introduction
    when reading it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email