Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-10 Wed, 11 August 2021 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26213A0BB0 for <>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 02:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DEVXYGoQkQj3 for <>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 02:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C363A0BB2 for <>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 02:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id n32so619095wms.2 for <>; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 02:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-language:thread-index; bh=ZZM7uyQCYRJdccsXzriXHIqMbwT5hteceHDIrkG4ppg=; b=lFnOFcobDU+zG1p5LTdMhfAyNiYw2rbkGnWfIqrYrhVHUJUU+kq1AyakdbIvpq4w7T TgJqu4fhz9nzSNmZxPtafxw+VotDxfg3TVx0WHdj7EOkf3N80CVGgTR5OzL2HCxlnBG5 C+sHhVf8+Nq01w7aG0W1miCLd6430B2XQ6Y9Gz6Yjs+9AdVaX/6f0bw19VrJYEgpvlD+ fHl45cPbl65BvN96+HMeBLvJQz5/57AXvG4C4TxMqOsfB7zriWwGKcziTn1vo8MXyIMA AxMapg9gW9HvWkfPrS+U/9K12m/unHT3eERUsQhtZ3LST6n+XYmKWgrpCXDnT4fS45Fg cPaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-language:thread-index; bh=ZZM7uyQCYRJdccsXzriXHIqMbwT5hteceHDIrkG4ppg=; b=gGJhXOmt9C1iNy71SkFqf7/xFPPo74jAmwdSZMOoJrtDdPVCpRxpjjru3pBC3DJU/y C+a++fi35nRXnzv1SIVYCpxkt69calV1RhgFS0H5a+it9+0pGVWktFpqUs1W89SaXb4w 9FG9WBJgjp1+Y0N4XmKk14cMLIwRhvPjzRnCB+Tc5X7MbvlOm88A3S59Gh/WildolJw5 NOoqh4sWn+l2HKP7VK9qXj/8KzIAghDKaM89taW0nrU9zmujND3lgUuNecjirjFUD7fV XAjnxLJIr2UaSKcMTwdt4iwbEbWiMaOuuUHxAq+YcS2I2jZHGVaf6knbI29iXB2JWpwS anWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZZYz/7cEGlkkz2kgXRwo2WRbIyXkYSOEG/kPY8QmEAL04ibXT WhcYlD08O0vMczwKy/keZM3g/w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7JYCKBhglb67Io4OGNAG91G6l3ztDgrsOxVKuGiD7Qf9OEwrirNC93dY0rZJdoonua+rung==
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf05:: with SMTP id l5mr1300959wmg.138.1628673140360; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 02:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CIPHER ([2a00:23c7:100:2c01:24d3:1a9c:84b8:b8c0]) by with ESMTPSA id m39sm4852088wms.28.2021. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 02:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Daniel King <>
X-Google-Original-Sender: <>
From: <>
To: "'Belotti, Sergio \(Nokia - IT/Vimercate\)'" <>, "'Vishnu Pavan Beeram'" <>, "'John E Drake'" <>, "'Zhenghaomian \(Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept\)'" <>, "'Adrian Farrel'" <>, <>, <>, "'Daniele Ceccarelli'" <>
Cc: "'TEAS WG Chairs'" <>, "'TEAS WG'" <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:12:18 +0100
Message-ID: <005001d78e90$fcb627f0$f62277d0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0051_01D78E99.5E7B5340"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQIvzBFZTg2qc5O/1wPGb0GpYWN5YQGeQbwgqrCWgkA=
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-10
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:12:33 -0000

Dear Chairs, All.


"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"


BR. Dan.


From: Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate) <> 
Sent: 11 August 2021 10:01
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <>om>; Daniel King <>uk>; John E Drake <>et>; Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept) <>om>; Adrian Farrel <>uk>;;; Daniele Ceccarelli <>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <>rg>; TEAS WG <>
Subject: RE: Regarding IPR on draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-10


Hi Pavan, all


"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"





From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram < <> > 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 10:58 AM
To: Daniel King < <> >; John E Drake < <> >; Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept) < <> >; Adrian Farrel < <> >; <> ; <> ; Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate) < <> >; Daniele Ceccarelli < <> >
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs < <> >; TEAS WG < <> >
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-10


Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed


If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above

Thank you,

Pavan and Lou