Re: [Teas] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-07

Jeong-dong Ryoo <ryoo@etri.re.kr> Mon, 21 June 2021 05:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ryoo@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF243A2396 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 22:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dooray.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01JtfMmIWJyA for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 22:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mscreen.etri.re.kr (mscreen.etri.re.kr [129.254.9.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AA393A2390 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 22:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO send001-relay.gov-dooray.com) (211.180.235.152) by 129.254.9.16 with ESMTP; 21 Jun 2021 14:45:43 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 211.180.235.152
X-Original-MAILFROM: ryoo@etri.re.kr
X-Original-RCPTTO: teas@ietf.org
Received: from [10.162.225.109] (HELO send002.gov-dooray.com) ([10.162.225.109]) by send001-relay.gov-dooray.com with SMTP id 7274ae3b60d02787; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:45:43 +0900
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=JORfhlxDbcJF1lFLN5tjsfDE3d8llSjdFbXL83LWvx5HOcPf3q6WCCXaXIy3OWEQJKBtw3/GtL HVj7Ahe1x+FN8qQf1AluTliG1EgE29cAexxWjICYvg3bSPgFw5tx5BrhRqXGExOJXKOCNhGw9dB/ ubqe3CjbhUNH5U3ZfWIpDslYnrxnQsQGNK4InYvnPj1DEBYfNdXcqFyG8Px77RntWTFlviPwZqh/ 8vdN45gqvygZ3zVw1ousK7klua18ev1e7yQA1Yy472MRdKNzuOQ/gzc8UiNvg0CWKnUY6USSXhM7 FsjyGKRM1uvUenqZYbpXmkO5qc9qpfBoZ+ubItAQ==; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=selector; d=dooray.com; v=1; bh=4drbncEs6d9Wpc6FV+hA6heCPW5dHTSU6sVsF5xB338=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID;
Dooray-Meta-Signature: ezfvJM9Zk8US91xVKRIvDryG17kZ9a0RPrStYPaHT5DPXy5J7ur3p H22CpXIPltD6s915o7W1VucUCd+W2Cmmzb1Yz6hTpO6WkJGj6mVBaiigzlMafiLUfPLuVCEGghQD 6h4WyFM4T6X/sHqnf2tKykA6SRHVU9TsMbFTbRePlWgOfqN6u5M3J1tLyKOsroCuMsSaiqX9czhx VlvELVINMrbONW9jvl3tqY4EgExzICg+kjelb3zJouvP7C4v1j5z+3M2u7qgRe8+G5UPfCl1v7M8 tD/mX8oZc3SDFIaylfOI+31yegaRQQbkWIWeMyA6RVgJr68i5gAPanEhgNYVgWzZhkPIz0jYs6ZW c5QsKw=
Received: from [129.254.197.129] (HELO 129.254.197.129) ([129.254.197.129]) by send002.gov-dooray.com with SMTP id 29ee81ce60d02785; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:45:41 +0900
From: Jeong-dong Ryoo <ryoo@etri.re.kr>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Cc: "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, "jgs@bgp.nu" <jgs@bgp.nu>, "vbeeram@juniper.net" <vbeeram@juniper.net>
Message-ID: <n2g5l8qtp1bv.n2g5l8qrsw6f.g1@dooray.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Dsn-Request: true
X-Dooray-Agent: mail-api
X-Dooray-Mail-Id: 3036252234792204283
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: Normal
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Dooray-Attached: c3+LUOpPU/IB7Wl+oemm0lw5HiI/bJHHYClX72L8E3o=
Sender: ryoo@etri.re.kr
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:45:40 +0900 (KST)
References: <162390932474.7544.260087122874045937@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB7PR07MB5546E3E448B28519715CEEE4A20D9@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>, <CA+YzgTsZ3nh-9QXcat7xZV_hMwyDHTEMKbbdj1rmnXm0BwmXeQ@mail.gmail.com> <DB7PR07MB554641FD8CBDA79797550028A20C9@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB7PR07MB554641FD8CBDA79797550028A20C9@DB7PR07MB5546.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/b7xoMXX8GQQ_CxaxPlxglNM7br0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-07
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 05:45:52 -0000

Tom and Pavan, 

Thank you for the comments and the suggested text to resolve the IANA-related issues.
We (authors) will reflect them into the next version along with breaking up the long text in Section 4. 

Pavan, 
Can we upload a revised draft at this stage, or are we supposed to wait for any step to finish?

Best regards,

Jeong-dong



-----Original Message-----
From:  "tom petch" <ietfa@btconnect.com>
To:     "Vishnu Pavan Beeram" <vishnupavan@gmail.com>om>; 
Cc:     "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>rg>;  "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>rg>;  "jgs@bgp.nu" <jgs@bgp.nu>nu>;  "vbeeram@juniper.net" <vbeeram@juniper.net>et>; 
Sent:  2021-06-20 (일) 02:16:24 (UTC+09:00)
Subject: Re: [Teas] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-07

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Sent: 18 June 2021 20:10

Tom, Hi!

Thanks! It is not too late. The authors would have sufficient opportunities to make improvements as it goes through the IESG processing stage.
The following suggested changes should address the comment on IANA assignments.

<tp>

Looks good.

Tom Petch

Regards,
-Pavan

----
In Section 4:

**
OLD:
   When a lower priority protecting LSP is preempted, the intermediate
   node that performed preemption MUST send a Notify message with a new
   sub-code "Shared resources unavailable" under "Notify Error" code
   (see [RFC4872]) to the end nodes of that protecting LSP.

NEW:
   When a lower priority protecting LSP is preempted, the intermediate
   node that performed preemption MUST send a Notify message with error
   code "Notify Error" (25) (see [RFC4872]) and error sub-code "Shared
   resources unavailable" (TBA1) to the end nodes of that protecting LSP.


**

OLD:
   When the shared resources become available, a Notify message with a
   new sub-code "Shared resources available" under "Notify Error" code
   MUST be generated by the intermediate node.

NEW:
   When the shared resources become available, a Notify message with
   error code "Notify Error" (25) and error sub-code "Shared resources
   available" (TBA2) MUST be generated by the intermediate node.

**

In Section 6:

OLD:
   This document requests IANA to define two new sub-code values under
   "Notify Error" code in Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP)
   parameters.

      Value        Description              Reference
      ----- ---------------------------- ---------------
      TBD1  Shared resources unavailable (this document)
      TBD2  Shared resources available   (this document)


NEW:
   IANA maintains a registry called "Resource Reservation Protocol
   (RSVP) Parameters" with a subregistry called "Error Codes and
   Globally-Defined Error Value Sub-Codes".  Within this subregistry
   there is a definition of the "Notify Error" error code (25).
   The definition lists a number of error value sub-codes that may be
   used with this error code.  IANA is requested to allocate further
   error value sub-codes for use with this error code as described in
   this document.

      Value        Description              Reference
      ----- ---------------------------- ---------------
      TBA1  Shared resources unavailable (this document)
      TBA2  Shared resources available   (this document)
**

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:48 AM tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com<mailto:ietfa@btconnect.com>> wrote:
From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Vishnu Beeram via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org<mailto:noreply@ietf.org>>
Sent: 17 June 2021 06:55

Vishnu Beeram has requested publication of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-07 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the TEAS working group.

Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp/

<tp>
Sigh late again or perhaps an early IETF Last Call comment.

IANA allocates TBD1 and TBD2 which never appear in the body of the document.  There are references to new sub-codes which is where I think that TBD should also appear, for clarity.

Also, they will not be new for long so I would drop the 'new' in that part of the text.

And to remove all doubt I would spell out in IANA Considerations that the new allocations are for Sub-code 25 (Notify Error)  of the Error Code registry. (Or if not, then spell out where they are)!

And, since the IETF has abolished the page number, I would suggest the use of subsections to break this up into referencable  parts of less than a page, as in
the current section 4 which in my format is 2 1/2 pages long.

Tom Petch
_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas