[Teas] 答复: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-06

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Wed, 03 June 2020 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABDF3A118B for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 18:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9z4OZPyDlDkz for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 18:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m176115.mail.qiye.163.com (m176115.mail.qiye.163.com [59.111.176.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 204C73A118A for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 18:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP2IOH5QC (unknown [219.142.69.75]) by m176115.mail.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 43AED664E31; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 09:04:45 +0800 (CST)
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>, 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
References: <147e62a8-91c6-12f4-4575-b3a3813e67bc@labn.net> <17274749180.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <17274749180.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 09:04:44 +0800
Message-ID: <000001d63942$f82d2020$e8876060$@tsinghua.org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQMf5M6e4ui8y6QH1rEkJR16qEgt7ADjtfQzpiuYK0A=
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgYFAkeWUFZS1VJSkhLS0tKSEhNSEhNSk9ZV1koWU FKTEtLSjdXWS1ZQUlXWQ8JGhUIEh9ZQVkPTisyOBw6SBVCNg9CQiEeIxYMSDo6VlZVTEwoSVlXWQ kOFx4IWUFZNTQpNjo3JCkuNz5ZV1kWGg8SFR0UWUFZNDBZBg++
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6PhA6IQw*IjgzER43ThkDCFE5 GUkwFBJVSlVKTkJKSk9NSUJLT05JVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxOWVdZCAFZQU9LSEM3Bg++
X-HM-Tid: 0a7277b5891b9373kuws43aed664e31
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/bELEkQ9PwWnckSITcRzsyK50pTU>
Subject: [Teas] 答复: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-06
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 01:04:58 -0000

Hi, Lou:

The summary of the changes during the WG LC comments are the followings:
1. Add description to explain the document's experimental track status, to
incentive more researches on its applications and experiences from the
community.
2. Illustrate more clearly on the requirements of candidate solutions.
3. Add reference to the based architecture RFC documents, such as RFC8231,
RFC8283. "PCE in native IP" solution can rely on these exist mechanisms.
4. Redraw all figures in the document to make the solution be stated more
clearly.
5. State more clearly about the "Deploy Consideration" and “Security
Considerations”, Further considerations can be expanded in the related PCEP
extension draft.
6. Additional editorial nits.

Are the above enough?

Best Regards

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: teas-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Lou
> Berger
> 发送时间: 2020年6月2日 17:55
> 收件人: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
> 主题: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-06
> 
> All,
> 
> The Last Call is closed.  There have been comments and once all are
> addressed the document will be submitted for publication as  Experimental.
> 
> Authors,
> 
> Thank you for being so proactive in addressing comments. Please send a
> summary of all changes made to address LC comments.
> 
> All,
> 
> If you made comments, it would be helpful to confirm that the current
> updated version addresses your comment(s).
> 
> Thank you!
> Lou
> 
> 
> ----------
> On May 15, 2020 2:59:20 PM Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> > All,
> >
> > This starts a two-week working group last call for
> > draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-06
> >
> > NOTE: IPR has been disclosed -- see
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-te
> > as-pce-native-ip
> >
> > The working group last call ends on May 29.
> > Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.
> >
> > Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it
> > is ready for publication", are welcome!
> > This is useful and important, even from authors.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Lou (TEAS Co-Chair & doc Shepherd)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > Teas@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas